Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98114
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorHo, Ven_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T08:28:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T08:28:02Z-
dc.identifier.issn1878-9714en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98114-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjaminsen_US
dc.rights© John Benjamins Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Ho, V. (2019). Hotel management’s attempts at repairing customers’ trust: The use of apology and denial. Pragmatics and Society, 10(4), 493-511. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18008.ho.en_US
dc.subjectApologyen_US
dc.subjectDenialen_US
dc.subjectHotel accommodationen_US
dc.subjectTripAdvisoren_US
dc.subjectTrust repairen_US
dc.subjectTrust violationen_US
dc.titleHotel management's attempts at repairing customers' trust : the use of apology and denialen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage493en_US
dc.identifier.epage511en_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/ps.18008.hoen_US
dcterms.abstractThe present study explores the discursive practice of the hospitality industry in addressing competence-based, benevolence-based, and integrity-based accusations of trust violation made by dissatisfied customers on TripAdvisor. Authentic negative online reviews written by dissatisfied customers and the corresponding responses by hotel management downloaded directly from TripAdvisor are analyzed qualitatively with Nvivo10. Results show that hotel management has the strongest preference for apology, followed by implicit denial and then explicit denial when dealing with the three different types of accusations of trust violation. The findings will enhance our understanding of trust and its repair, and benefit hospitality practitioners responsible for handling online criticisms and complaints.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPragmatics and society, Dec. 2019, v. 10, no. 4, p. 493-511en_US
dcterms.isPartOfPragmatics and societyen_US
dcterms.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078930260-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-9722en_US
dc.description.validate202304 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberENGL-0085-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS20418755-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ho_Hotel_Managements_Attempts.pdfPre-Published version458.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

51
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

175
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.