Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98114
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of English and Communication | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ho, V | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-12T08:28:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-12T08:28:02Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1878-9714 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98114 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | John Benjamins | en_US |
| dc.rights | © John Benjamins Publishing Company | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is the accepted version of the publication Ho, V. (2019). Hotel management’s attempts at repairing customers’ trust: The use of apology and denial. Pragmatics and Society, 10(4), 493-511. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18008.ho. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Apology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Denial | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hotel accommodation | en_US |
| dc.subject | TripAdvisor | en_US |
| dc.subject | Trust repair | en_US |
| dc.subject | Trust violation | en_US |
| dc.title | Hotel management's attempts at repairing customers' trust : the use of apology and denial | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 493 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 511 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 10 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1075/ps.18008.ho | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | The present study explores the discursive practice of the hospitality industry in addressing competence-based, benevolence-based, and integrity-based accusations of trust violation made by dissatisfied customers on TripAdvisor. Authentic negative online reviews written by dissatisfied customers and the corresponding responses by hotel management downloaded directly from TripAdvisor are analyzed qualitatively with Nvivo10. Results show that hotel management has the strongest preference for apology, followed by implicit denial and then explicit denial when dealing with the three different types of accusations of trust violation. The findings will enhance our understanding of trust and its repair, and benefit hospitality practitioners responsible for handling online criticisms and complaints. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Pragmatics and society, Dec. 2019, v. 10, no. 4, p. 493-511 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Pragmatics and society | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2019-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85078930260 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1878-9722 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202304 bcww | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | ENGL-0085 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 20418755 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ho_Hotel_Managements_Attempts.pdf | Pre-Published version | 458.52 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
51
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
175
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
10
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



