Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98110
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorMcKeown, Jen_US
dc.creatorLadegaard, HJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T08:28:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T08:28:01Z-
dc.identifier.issn2211-6958en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98110-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication McKeown, J., & Ladegaard, H. J. (2020). Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 33, 100367 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100367.en_US
dc.subjectCivil discourseen_US
dc.subjectIncivilityen_US
dc.subjectMetadiscourseen_US
dc.subjectMetadiscursive targetsen_US
dc.subjectTV newsen_US
dc.titleExploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourseen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100367en_US
dcterms.abstractThe present paper examines the use of metadiscourse in the realisation of incivility in TV news discourse. We take empirical data from a UK Channel 4 News interview between TV journalist and author Cathy Newman and clinical psychologist and author Professor Jordan Peterson. Adopting a discourse analytic approach, five aspects of incivility are presented: intolerant response; ideological entrenchment; low oppositional literacy; the need to win; and, change of opinion condemnation. We show how metadiscourse is used to manifest incivility in a number of ways including to prioritise the current speaker's foci over those of the interlocutor; to express metalingual commentary which negatively characterises the interlocutor's discourse; and, to express discourse norms which undermine the open exchange of ideas. We conclude by suggesting recommendations for future research.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDiscourse, context and media, Mar. 2020, v. 33, 100367en_US
dcterms.isPartOfDiscourse, context and mediaen_US
dcterms.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076499447-
dc.identifier.eissn2211-6966en_US
dc.identifier.artn100367en_US
dc.description.validate202304 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberENGL-0069-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS21840225-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mckeown_Exploring_Metadiscursive_Realisation.pdfPre-Published version1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

79
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

92
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.