Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98093
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorXiang, Xen_US
dc.creatorZheng, Ben_US
dc.creatorFeng, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T08:27:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T08:27:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn0378-2166en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98093-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Xiang, X., Zheng, B., & Feng, D. (2020). Interpreting impoliteness and over-politeness: An investigation into interpreters' cognitive effort, coping strategies and their effects. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 231-244 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.021.en_US
dc.subjectCognitive efforten_US
dc.subjectCoping strategies and effectsen_US
dc.subjectImpolitenessen_US
dc.subjectIntercultural pragmatic competenceen_US
dc.subjectLiaison interpretingen_US
dc.subjectOver-politenessen_US
dc.titleInterpreting impoliteness and over-politeness : an investigation into interpreters' cognitive effort, coping strategies and their effectsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage231en_US
dc.identifier.epage244en_US
dc.identifier.volume169en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.021en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper investigates how politeness is treated in interpreter-mediated events and how the treatment is related to interpreters' pragmatic competence. An empirical study was conducted for this purpose, in which twenty-two professional and student interpreters were asked to work in a liaison interpreting mode. An analysis of the interpreters' cognitive effort involved (i.e. the interpreting process) and the coping strategies employed (i.e. the interpreting product) in dealing with impolite and over-polite utterances, together with their retrospections, produced three findings: 1) Impolite and over-polite utterances slowed down the processing speed of interpreting, indicating that more cognitive effort was involved. Professionals were particularly affected when interpreting from English to Chinese, students the opposite direction. 2) Various coping strategies beyond literal interpreting were adopted by both groups. Professionals used coping strategies more liberally and intentionally than students, especially syntactic ones and omission. 3) The overriding majority of the strategies succeeded in mitigating the face-threatening force implied in the utterances. The differences between the two groups are explained by their different levels of intercultural pragmatic competence. This study contributes to the interlingual and cross-cultural study of politeness, and the exploration of the complexity of the interpreter's role.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of pragmatics, Nov. 2020, v. 169, p. 231-244en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of pragmaticsen_US
dcterms.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092020926-
dc.description.validate202304 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberENGL-0043-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Social Science Foud of China [grant number 17BYY089]en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS51712045-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Feng_Interpreting_Impoliteness_Over-Politeness.pdfPre-Published version1.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

85
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

290
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.