Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98050
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorAnwar, SNBMen_US
dc.creatorAlvarado, Ven_US
dc.creatorHsu, SCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-06T07:55:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-06T07:55:52Z-
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98050-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Anwar, S. N. B. M., Alvarado, V., & Hsu, S. C. (2021). A socio-eco-efficiency analysis of water and wastewater treatment processes for refugee communities in Jordan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105196 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105196.en_US
dc.subjectAnalytic Hierarchy Processen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectLife cycle costen_US
dc.subjectSocial life cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectWastewater Treatmenten_US
dc.titleA socio-eco-efficiency analysis of water and wastewater treatment processes for refugee communities in Jordanen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume164en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105196en_US
dcterms.abstractAs of 2017, the United Nations has estimated that there are 68.5 million displaced people in the world which live in refugee camps (RCs) in 125 host countries. RCs frequently encounter water scarcity issues which lead to a low daily limit of water consumption, as well as face management difficulties such as septic tank overflowing which contribute to the development of health problems. Considering the need for more sustainable water, sanitation, and hygiene system in RCs, a socio-eco-efficiency analysis (SEEA) framework is proposed for the analysis and comparison of different wastewater treatment methods. The SEEA framework consists of the integration of the economic and environmental aspects analysed by an eco-efficiency analysis (EEA) with the social aspects evaluated by a social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) using the analytic hierarchy process. The SEEA framework was applied to compare different wastewater treatment methods in Zaatari Refugee Camp in Jordan. The SEEA results show that, if adopted, an effluent water reuse-based treatment would increase economic efficiency by 75%, decrease environmental impacts by 57%, and increase social sustainability by 57% compared to the current operation of the camp, where a wastewater system connects groups of seven to nine households to communal septic tanks. A ternary diagram is used to represent the comparison of different wastewater treatment methods for an RC. The diagram shows the degree of socio-eco-efficiency of each wastewater treatment method, in terms of its social impacts, environmental impacts, and cost by normalising results of the EEA and S-LCA into one score.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationResources, conservation and recycling, Jan. 2021, v. 164, 105196en_US
dcterms.isPartOfResources, conservation and recyclingen_US
dcterms.issued2021-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092097276-
dc.identifier.artn105196en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-0493-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS30542069-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hsu_Socio-Eco-Efficiency_Analysis.pdfPre-Published version1.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

140
Last Week
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

173
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.