Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97693
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorMental Health Research Centreen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorMa, Hen_US
dc.creatorLin, Jen_US
dc.creatorHe, Jen_US
dc.creatorLo, DHTen_US
dc.creatorTsang, HWHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T07:42:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-09T07:42:44Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97693-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 Ma, Lin, He, Lo and Tsang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ma H, Lin J, He J, Lo DHT and Tsang HWH (2021) Effectiveness of TES and rTMS for the Treatment of Insomnia: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials. Front. Psychiatry 12:744475. is available at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.744475en_US
dc.subjectInsomniaen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectMeta-regressionen_US
dc.subjectRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial electric stimulationen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of TES and rTMS for the treatment of insomnia : meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized sham-controlled trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyt.2021.744475en_US
dcterms.abstractObjectives: Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have experienced significant development in treating insomnia. This review aims to examine the effectiveness of randomized sham-controlled trials of TES and rTMS in improving insomnia and examine potential moderators associated with the effect of the treatment.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Nine electronic databases were searched for studies comparing the effects of TES/rTMS with sham group on insomnia from the inception of these databases to June 25, 2021, namely, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis, and CNKI. Meta-analyses were conducted to examine the effect of TES and rTMS in treating insomnia. Univariate meta-regression was performed to explore potential treatment moderators that may influence the pooled results. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: A total of 16 TES studies and 27 rTMS studies were included in this review. The pooled results indicated that there was no significant difference between the TES group and the sham group in improving objective measures of sleep. rTMS was superior to its sham group in improving sleep efficiency, total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wake up after sleep onset, and number of awakenings (all p < 0.05). Both TES and rTMS were superior to their sham counterparts in improving sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at post-intervention. The weighted mean difference for TES and rTMS were −1.17 (95% CI: −1.98, −0.36) and −4.08 (95% CI: −4.86, −3.30), respectively. Gender, total treatment sessions, number of pulses per session, and length of treatment per session were associated with rTMS efficacy. No significant relationship was observed between TES efficacy and the stimulation parameters.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: It seems that TES and rTMS have a chance to play a decisive role in the therapy of insomnia. Possible dose-dependent and gender difference effects of rTMS are suggested.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFrontiers in Psychiatry, Oct. 2021, v. 12, 744475en_US
dcterms.isPartOfFrontiers in psychiatryen_US
dcterms.issued2021-10-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000716566800001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118734302-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-0640en_US
dc.identifier.artn744475en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ma_Effectiveness_TES_rTMS.pdf1.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

111
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

90
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.