Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97622
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorAu, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T07:09:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-08T07:09:35Z-
dc.identifier.issn0144-333Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97622-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.rights© Emerald Publishing Limited. This AAM is provided for your own personal use only. It may not be used for resale, reprinting, systematic distribution, emailing, or for any other commercial purpose without the permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Au, A. (2023), "Consumer logics and the relational performance of selling high-risk goods: the case of elective cosmetic surgery", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 43 No. 9/10, pp. 853-869 is published by Emerald and is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2022-0180.en_US
dc.subjectClinicsen_US
dc.subjectEconomic sociologyen_US
dc.subjectEthnographyen_US
dc.subjectProfessions and organizationsen_US
dc.subjectSouth Koreaen_US
dc.titleConsumer logics and the relational performance of selling high-risk goods : the case of elective cosmetic surgeryen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage853en_US
dc.identifier.epage869en_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue9/10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJSSP-07-2022-0180en_US
dcterms.abstractPurpose: This article investigates how medical specialists as professionals and elective cosmetic surgery tourists as consumers relationally negotiate decisions within the cosmetic surgery clinic. Drawing on a Goffmanian approach, this article explores the processual social structures that shape consumer logics in the clinic as a social space and as a type of professional institution.en_US
dcterms.abstractDesign/methodology/approach: This article is based on ethnographic fieldwork in cosmetic surgery clinics in South Korea.en_US
dcterms.abstractFindings: This article identifies two genres of professional strategies (spatial arrangements and dramaturgical performances) that are leveraged by medical specialists to assert control over and persuade consumers to purchase cosmetic surgery.en_US
dcterms.abstractResearch limitations/implications: The valorization of surgery captured in this article suggests that surgical modifications may serve as another vehicle for entrenching class inequality between those able and those unable to afford surgery.en_US
dcterms.abstractPractical implications: This article offers recommendations for future policymaking in terms of the regulatory oversight of the consumer profiles eligible for surgery and the marketing practices of clinics.en_US
dcterms.abstractOriginality/value: This article offers a micro-level account of how the high-risk good of cosmetic surgery is sold by medical specialists in charismatic and affective bids to enhance their legitimacy, authority and trust.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of sociology and social policy, 2023, v. 43, no. 9/10, p. 853-869en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of sociology and social policyen_US
dcterms.issued2023-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85142646881-
dc.description.validate202303 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1949-
dc.identifier.SubFormID46192-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextMitacsen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Au_Consumer_Logics_Relational.pdfPre-Published version853.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

108
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

113
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.