Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97621
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorAu, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T07:09:34Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-08T07:09:34Z-
dc.identifier.issn0011-3921en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97621-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Au, A. (2024). A Black feminist approach to antiracist qualitative research methods: Commemorating the legacy of bell hooks. Current Sociology, 72(6), 1185-1203. © 2022 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/00113921221146583.en_US
dc.subjectAntiracismen_US
dc.subjectBell hooksen_US
dc.subjectBlack feminismen_US
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_US
dc.subjectMarginalized identitiesen_US
dc.subjectQualitative research methodsen_US
dc.titleA black feminist approach to antiracist qualitative research methods : commemorating the legacy of bell hooksen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1185en_US
dc.identifier.epage1203en_US
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00113921221146583en_US
dcterms.abstractThis article commemorates the legacy of bell hooks by bringing core themes in her oeuvre to bear on several debates on the conceptualization and use of qualitative research methods in sociology. Despite the uptake of qualitative research methods in sociology as a launching point for critical inquiry with analytical and political overtones, they have been fragmented threefold by debates about their politics (whether to humanize research subjects), practice (whether to intervene in field research), and epistemology (procedural, craft, and bricolage orientations). Reflecting on the legacy of bell hooks, this article articulates a Black feminist approach by unearthing methodological and epistemological themes underwritten in hooks’ work (inclusive pedagogy, creative dialogue, and reflexive accountability) to offer new perspectives on the three debates and, in so doing, to identify ways to better qualitative research methods as tools for emancipating the marginalized – by invigorating cross-professional and transdisciplinary dialogue, collaboration, and love.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCurrent sociology, Oct. 2024, v. 72, no. 6, p. 1185-1203en_US
dcterms.isPartOfCurrent sociologyen_US
dcterms.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145098083-
dc.identifier.eissn1461-7064en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1949-
dc.identifier.SubFormID46193-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Au_Black_Feminist_Approach.pdfPre-Published version833.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

77
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

15
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.