Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97586
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorAbdelkhalek, Sen_US
dc.creatorZayed, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T01:20:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T01:20:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn1573-2479en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97586-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Structure and Infrastructure Engineering on 2021-06-12 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15732479.2021.1937234.en_US
dc.subjectAnalytic network processen_US
dc.subjectConcrete bridge decken_US
dc.subjectInspectionen_US
dc.subjectNon-destructive technologiesen_US
dc.subjectPerformance assessmenten_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.titlePerformance assessment model of non-destructive technologies in inspecting concrete bridge decksen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage216en_US
dc.identifier.epage237en_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15732479.2021.1937234en_US
dcterms.abstractNon-destructive testing (NDT) methods are typically utilized to thoroughly inspect existing defects in the concrete bridge deck and tackle the limitations of common inspection practices (e.g. visual inspection). Nevertheless, the reliability of inspection outcomes crucially depends on choosing the most appropriate NDT technologies. In this regard, a comprehensive Performance Assessment Model (PAM) was developed. The developed model incorporated 40 parameters to precisely assess the performance of different NDT technologies from diverse perspectives (e.g. defect detection capability, ease of use, speed, and cost). The required data were collected through a survey questionnaire. The model utilized the Analytic Network Process (ANP) technique to calculate the importance weight of each parameter, whereas the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was exploited to compute the performance index (PI) of NDT technologies. The outcomes of this study clearly illustrate the disparity in the performance of different NDT technologies. Furthermore, it was shown that none of these technologies could either exhibit the best performance in all the proposed parameters or efficiently identify all types of defects. Based on the PAM results, a selection model was proposed to assist bridge authorities and consultants in choosing the most efficient NDT technologies for inspection purposes.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStructure and infrastructure engineering, 2023, v. 19, no. 2, p. 216-237en_US
dcterms.isPartOfStructure and infrastructure engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2023-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107800615-
dc.identifier.eissn1744-8980en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bcww-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0196-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS54511715-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abdelkhalek_Performance_Assessment_Model.pdfPre-Published version2.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

122
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

214
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.