Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97586
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | en_US |
| dc.creator | Abdelkhalek, S | en_US |
| dc.creator | Zayed, T | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-06T01:20:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-06T01:20:23Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1573-2479 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97586 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Structure and Infrastructure Engineering on 2021-06-12 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15732479.2021.1937234. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Analytic network process | en_US |
| dc.subject | Concrete bridge deck | en_US |
| dc.subject | Inspection | en_US |
| dc.subject | Non-destructive technologies | en_US |
| dc.subject | Performance assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject | TOPSIS | en_US |
| dc.title | Performance assessment model of non-destructive technologies in inspecting concrete bridge decks | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 216 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 237 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 19 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/15732479.2021.1937234 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Non-destructive testing (NDT) methods are typically utilized to thoroughly inspect existing defects in the concrete bridge deck and tackle the limitations of common inspection practices (e.g. visual inspection). Nevertheless, the reliability of inspection outcomes crucially depends on choosing the most appropriate NDT technologies. In this regard, a comprehensive Performance Assessment Model (PAM) was developed. The developed model incorporated 40 parameters to precisely assess the performance of different NDT technologies from diverse perspectives (e.g. defect detection capability, ease of use, speed, and cost). The required data were collected through a survey questionnaire. The model utilized the Analytic Network Process (ANP) technique to calculate the importance weight of each parameter, whereas the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was exploited to compute the performance index (PI) of NDT technologies. The outcomes of this study clearly illustrate the disparity in the performance of different NDT technologies. Furthermore, it was shown that none of these technologies could either exhibit the best performance in all the proposed parameters or efficiently identify all types of defects. Based on the PAM results, a selection model was proposed to assist bridge authorities and consultants in choosing the most efficient NDT technologies for inspection purposes. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Structure and infrastructure engineering, 2023, v. 19, no. 2, p. 216-237 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Structure and infrastructure engineering | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85107800615 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1744-8980 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202303 bcww | - |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | BRE-0196 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 54511715 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdelkhalek_Performance_Assessment_Model.pdf | Pre-Published version | 2.56 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
122
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
214
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
13
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



