Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97533
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorTsang, YKen_US
dc.creatorAbdelmageed, Sen_US
dc.creatorZayed, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T01:19:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T01:19:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn1076-0431en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97533-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000462.en_US
dc.subjectAnalytic network process (ANP)en_US
dc.subjectContractor failureen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy questionnaireen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of a contractor failure prediction model using analytic network processen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000462en_US
dcterms.abstractConstruction contractor failure is one of the most critical and costly risks for a employer. Despite the ability of the employer to terminate the construction contract due to the contractor's failure to achieve crucial contractual objectives, the employer still suffers adverse impacts on time, cost, and goodwill. Under price-driven selection, construction contracts are usually awarded to the lowest bidder, with little attention to a bidder's capabilities. Therefore, this study attempted to develop a model to assist construction professionals in selecting the bidder with the lowest failure potential. The analytic network process (ANP) was used to analyze the data collected from a prepared fuzzy questionnaire. The results concluded a ranking for the reasons of contractor failure, which were initially identified from the literature and categorized into five categories. The results showed that "corporate governance"and "financial position"are the first and second most influential categories indicating contractor failure potential, respectively. Furthermore, "cost control,""tender approach,"and "technical competency"are ranked as the third, fourth, and least influential categories, respectively. Construction practitioners can utilize the model developed by this study to evaluate bidders to minimize the probability of contractor failure and, consequently, to maximize the probability of successful project delivery.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of architectural engineering, June 2021, v. 27, no. 2, 4021006en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of architectural engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102335958-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-5568en_US
dc.identifier.artn4021006en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bcww-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0071-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS54512573-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zayed_Development_Contractor_Failure.pdfPre-Published version1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

98
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

87
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.