Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97519
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorJi, Ten_US
dc.creatorChen, JHen_US
dc.creatorWei, HHen_US
dc.creatorSu, YCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T01:19:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T01:19:47Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97519-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ji, T., Chen, J. H., Wei, H. H., & Su, Y. C. (2021). Towards people-centric smart city development: Investigating the citizens’ preferences and perceptions about smart-city services in Taiwan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102691 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102691.en_US
dc.subjectCitizens’ preferenceen_US
dc.subjectCity developmenten_US
dc.subjectHuman needsen_US
dc.subjectPeople-centricen_US
dc.subjectSmart-city servicesen_US
dc.titleTowards people-centric smart city development : Investigating the citizens’ preferences and perceptions about smart-city services in Taiwanen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume67en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scs.2020.102691en_US
dcterms.abstractCity administrators hoping to achieve people-centric smart city (SC) development require a clear understanding of citizens’ preferences and perceptions about SC services. This study fills that need by presenting evidence-based research on such preferences and perceptions from the perspective of need theories, taking Taiwan as a case study. Specifically, we investigated Taiwanese citizens’ preferences for 35 SC services of seven dimensions classified in two domains, as well as their three perceptions of the usefulness of these SC services in the realization of human needs. The results show that most of our respondents clearly perceived SC services as both important and useful to their existence, relatedness, and growth needs, and that they expressed relatively higher preferences for such services to operate in the “hard” domain – e.g., smart energy, smart transport, or smart safety –than the “soft” one, e.g., smart living. Based on these findings, this study provides policy recommendations that, if implemented, could be expected to advance SC development by increasing citizens’ usage of SC services in both the hard and soft domains, and serve the wider aim of improving their well-being and quality of life.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable cities and society, Apr. 2021, v. 67, 102691en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable cities and societyen_US
dcterms.issued2021-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099346417-
dc.identifier.eissn2210-6707en_US
dc.identifier.artn102691en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bcww-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0104-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS53095510-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ji_Towards_People-Centric_Smart.pdfPre-Published version2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

119
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

419
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

129
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

97
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.