Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97308
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorBonsaksen, Ten_US
dc.creatorSmåstuen, MCen_US
dc.creatorThørrisen, MMen_US
dc.creatorFong, Ken_US
dc.creatorLim, HBen_US
dc.creatorBrown, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T01:13:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T01:13:38Z-
dc.identifier.issn0045-0766en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97308-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_US
dc.rights©2018 Occupational Therapy Australiaen_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bonsaksen, T., Småstuen, M. C., Thørrisen, M. M., Fong, K., Lim, H. B., & Brown, T. (2019). Factor analysis of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students in a cross‐cultural occupational therapy undergraduate student sample. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(1), 33-43, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12504. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.en_US
dc.subjectFactor analysisen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectOccupational therapyen_US
dc.subjectPsychometricsen_US
dc.subjectStudentsen_US
dc.titleFactor analysis of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students in a cross-cultural occupational therapy undergraduate student sampleen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage33en_US
dc.identifier.epage43en_US
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1440-1630.12504en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground/aim: The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) has been used previously to assess the learning approaches among students in higher education, but reports of its use with occupational therapy students are rare. This study investigated the factor structure of the ASSIST in a cross-cultural sample of undergraduate occupational therapy students, and examined whether the factor structure from specific participant groups from different cross-cultural contexts was consistent.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Occupational therapy students (n = 712) from education programmes in Australia, Norway, Hong Kong and Singapore completed the ASSIST. To assess the factor structure of the instrument, a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) using a confirmatory approach, was completed. Cronbach's coefficient α and inter-item correlations were used to assess the internal consistency of the ASSIST and its subscales.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: For the whole sample, the PCA confirmed the three primary factors as previously established. Five subscales loaded on the first factor (strategic approach). Four subscales loaded on the second factor (surface approach), whereas the remaining four subscales loaded on the third factor (deep approach). Repeating the analysis for each of the country-specific samples produced slightly diverging factor structures for the samples from Australia and Hong Kong.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion: Considering all the data, the ASSIST subscales that emerged from the PCA used with a confirmatory approach in this study revealed a good degree of concordance with the established original factor, scale and subscale structure. The slightly deviating results obtained for the Hong Kong student group indicate that the established factor structure may not be the best fit across all settings, cultural contexts and sample groups.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAustralian occupational therapy journal, Feb. 2019, v. 66, no. 1, p. 33-43en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAustralian occupational therapy journalen_US
dcterms.issued2019-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85060990232-
dc.identifier.pmid30062739-
dc.identifier.eissn1440-1630en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRS-0277-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS51849186-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fong_Factor_Analysis_Approaches.pdfPre-Published version982.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

67
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

53
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.