Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97282
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorThørrisen, MMen_US
dc.creatorMørk, Gen_US
dc.creatorÅsli, LAen_US
dc.creatorGramstad, Aen_US
dc.creatorStigen, Len_US
dc.creatorMagne, TAen_US
dc.creatorCarstensen, Ten_US
dc.creatorJohnson, SGen_US
dc.creatorBrown, Ten_US
dc.creatorLim, HBen_US
dc.creatorFong, KNKen_US
dc.creatorBonsaksen, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T01:13:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T01:13:24Z-
dc.identifier.issn1103-8128en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97282-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy on 11 Oct 2020 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/11038128.2020.1831056.en_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectLearningen_US
dc.subjectMultinomial logistic regressionen_US
dc.subjectOccupational therapyen_US
dc.titleStudent characteristics associated with dominant approaches to studying : comparing a national and an international sampleen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage13en_US
dc.identifier.epage24en_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/11038128.2020.1831056en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Productive approaches to studying (deep and strategic learning) are associated with a variety of favourable academic outcomes, and may be of particular importance for students in multifaceted and complex disciplines such as occupational therapy.en_US
dcterms.abstractAim: To explore associations between student characteristics and their dominant approaches to studying in two samples of occupational therapy students: a national sample of Norwegian first-year students, and an international sample of students in different year cohorts (Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Norway).en_US
dcterms.abstractMaterials and methods: A total of 180 (national sample) and 665 (international sample) students were included in the study. Approaches to studying were measured with the Approaches to Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Data were analyzed with adjusted multinomial regression analyses.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Age, gender and prior higher education were not associated with the dominant study approach. More time spent on independent study (international sample: OR = 1.07/1.08, p < 0.01/<0.001) and having current study program as the top priority line of education at enrolment (national sample: OR = 2.89, p < 0.05) predicted productive study approaches.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions and significance: Factors such as age, gender and prior higher education seem to be of limited importance for understanding students’ dominant approaches to studying.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationScandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 2022, v. 29, no. 1, p. 13-24en_US
dcterms.isPartOfScandinavian journal of occupational therapyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092511992-
dc.identifier.pmid33043750-
dc.identifier.eissn1651-2014en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRS-0096-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS43768807-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fong_Student_Characteristics_Associated.pdfPre-Published version1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

75
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

85
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.