Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97274
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Rehabilitation Sciences | en_US |
| dc.creator | Love, A | en_US |
| dc.creator | Cornwell, P | en_US |
| dc.creator | Hewetson, R | en_US |
| dc.creator | Shum, D | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-06T01:13:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-06T01:13:19Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0268-7038 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97274 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Aphasiology on 11 Mar 2021 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02687038.2021.1897080. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cognitive-communication disorder | en_US |
| dc.subject | Nominal group technique | en_US |
| dc.subject | Right-hemisphere stroke | en_US |
| dc.subject | Screening | en_US |
| dc.title | Test item priorities for a screening tool to identify cognitive-communication disorder after right hemisphere stroke | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 669 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 686 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 36 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02687038.2021.1897080 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Background: Early recognition of stroke signs and symptoms is critical to ensure people receive the right treatment at the right time. Communication impairment associated with left-hemisphere stroke is easily identifiable due to the recognisable signs of aphasia, whereas signs of cognitive-communication disorder (CCD) after right hemisphere (RH) stroke are often subtler. In contrast to aphasia, no sensitive screening tools exist to allow for early identification of CCD after RH stroke. | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Aims: To prioritise test items required for a screening tool to identify CCD after RH stroke from the perspective of expert speech-language pathologists. | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Methods & Procedures: The nominal group technique (NGT) was used with expert speech-language pathologists to determine the most important test items required for a screening tool to identify RH CCD. Results were analysed using a quantitative measure of item ranking and inductive content analysis. | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Outcomes & Results: Five expert speech pathologists located across Australia and the USA, representing a mix of clinicians and researchers participated in the nominal group. The highest ranked test items across the four cognitive-communication domains (lexical semantics, discourse, pragmatics and prosody) were interpretation of sarcasm or humour, rating conversational discourse, a conversational skills checklist, and expressive prosody. Content analysis revealed three themes: Assessment Domains, Considerations in Item Design and Knowledge Gap. | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Conclusions: The NGT revealed that multiple considerations exist in developing a screening tool for CCD after RH stroke. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Aphasiology, 2022, v. 36, no. 6, p. 669-686 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Aphasiology | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85102507827 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1464-5041 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202303 bckw | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | RS-0071 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation Building Innovation and Capacity Grant | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 61064979 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shum_Test_Item_Priorities.pdf | Pre-Published version | 878.88 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
68
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
110
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



