Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97274
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorLove, Aen_US
dc.creatorCornwell, Pen_US
dc.creatorHewetson, Ren_US
dc.creatorShum, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T01:13:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T01:13:19Z-
dc.identifier.issn0268-7038en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97274-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Aphasiology on 11 Mar 2021 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02687038.2021.1897080.en_US
dc.subjectCognitive-communication disorderen_US
dc.subjectNominal group techniqueen_US
dc.subjectRight-hemisphere strokeen_US
dc.subjectScreeningen_US
dc.titleTest item priorities for a screening tool to identify cognitive-communication disorder after right hemisphere strokeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage669en_US
dc.identifier.epage686en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02687038.2021.1897080en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Early recognition of stroke signs and symptoms is critical to ensure people receive the right treatment at the right time. Communication impairment associated with left-hemisphere stroke is easily identifiable due to the recognisable signs of aphasia, whereas signs of cognitive-communication disorder (CCD) after right hemisphere (RH) stroke are often subtler. In contrast to aphasia, no sensitive screening tools exist to allow for early identification of CCD after RH stroke.en_US
dcterms.abstractAims: To prioritise test items required for a screening tool to identify CCD after RH stroke from the perspective of expert speech-language pathologists.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods & Procedures: The nominal group technique (NGT) was used with expert speech-language pathologists to determine the most important test items required for a screening tool to identify RH CCD. Results were analysed using a quantitative measure of item ranking and inductive content analysis.en_US
dcterms.abstractOutcomes & Results: Five expert speech pathologists located across Australia and the USA, representing a mix of clinicians and researchers participated in the nominal group. The highest ranked test items across the four cognitive-communication domains (lexical semantics, discourse, pragmatics and prosody) were interpretation of sarcasm or humour, rating conversational discourse, a conversational skills checklist, and expressive prosody. Content analysis revealed three themes: Assessment Domains, Considerations in Item Design and Knowledge Gap.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The NGT revealed that multiple considerations exist in developing a screening tool for CCD after RH stroke.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAphasiology, 2022, v. 36, no. 6, p. 669-686en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAphasiologyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102507827-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5041en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRS-0071-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Prince Charles Hospital Foundation Building Innovation and Capacity Granten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS61064979-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shum_Test_Item_Priorities.pdfPre-Published version878.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

68
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

110
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.