Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97159
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Hen_US
dc.creatorChaouch-Orozco, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-10T00:38:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-10T00:38:16Z-
dc.identifier.issn1366-7289en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97159-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Liu, H., & Chaouch-Orozco, A. (2023). Is the digit effect a cognate effect? Digits (still) differ from pictures in non-phonologically mediated language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(3), 469-475 is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000608.en_US
dc.subjectBilingualismen_US
dc.subjectSwitch costsen_US
dc.subjectLanguage controlen_US
dc.subjectDigit namingen_US
dc.subjectPicture namingen_US
dc.titleIs the digit effect a cognate effect? Digits (still) differ from pictures in non-phonologically mediated language switchingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage469en_US
dc.identifier.epage475en_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1366728922000608en_US
dcterms.abstractLanguage control in bilinguals is often investigated with the language switching paradigm. Switch costs reflect the ease/difficulty of applying this control mechanism. The type of stimuli employed in the experiments may influence switch costs. To date, only one study has compared digit vs picture processing, reporting reduced switch costs for digits (Declerck, Koch & Philipp, 2012). This result was adjudicated to phonological overlap between the languages used. Crucially, it remains an open question whether this digit effect generalises to language combinations without phonological relation. We fill this gap by investigating language switching with two language pairs differing in relative proficiency (L1 Chinese–L2 English, L1 Chinese–L3 French), where cross-language phonological activation is not expected. Overall, a digit effect is observed in the Chinese–English pair. Contrary to Declerck et al.'s (2012) finding, digits increased switch costs. Phonological mediation cannot explain this effect; instead, we suggest its origin lies in within-language word association links.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBilingualism, May 2023, v. 26, no. 3, p. 469-475en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBilingualismen_US
dcterms.issued2023-05-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000889498400001-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-1841en_US
dc.description.validate202302 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1906-
dc.identifier.SubFormID46105-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universitiesen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chaouch-Orozco_Digit_Effect_Cognate.pdf255.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

68
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

40
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Jun 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.