Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97069
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Management and Marketing | - |
| dc.creator | Zhan, X | en_US |
| dc.creator | Tang, SY | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-17T06:57:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-17T06:57:49Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0033-3352 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97069 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2016 by The American Society for Public Administration. | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Zhan, X., & Tang, S. Y. (2016). Understanding the implications of government ties for nonprofit operations and functions. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 589-600, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12515. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited. | en_US |
| dc.title | Understanding the implications of government ties for nonprofit operations and functions | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 589 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 600 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 76 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/puar.12515 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | This research explores the implications of nonprofit leaders’ government ties for nonprofit operations and functions. Based on 81 survey questionnaires completed by civic environmental NGOs (eNGOs) in China and interviews with executives from 33 eNGOs, the authors examine the personal backgrounds of eNGO leaders and find that most Chinese civic eNGOs are connected with the government in one or more of three ways: political ties, service organization ties, or personal ties. Personal ties, or good guanxi with government officials, are positively associated with a higher level of funding stability and a more developed management system. Environmental NGOs with leaders who are current government officials or legislative body members are more likely to be engaged in policy advocacy. Service organization ties facilitate eNGOs’ efforts to be engaged in legal services and to scale up to work on environmental issues at the national level. Moreover, an eNGO’s policy advocacy engagement is associated with its ties with the nonprofit community. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Public administration review, July-Aug. 2016, v. 76, no. 4, p. 589-600 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Public administration review | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2016-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84958211526 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1540-6210 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202301 bckw | - |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | MM-0255 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation; City University of Hong Kong | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 6617068 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhan_Understanding_Implications_Government.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.31 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
224
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
83
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
62
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



