Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97029
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.creatorLi, Sen_US
dc.creatorLu, JWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T06:57:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-17T06:57:30Z-
dc.identifier.issn0001-4273en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97029-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademy of Managementen_US
dc.rights© Academy of Management Journalen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted manuscript of the following article: Li, S., & Lu, J. W. (2020). A dual-agency model of firm CSR in response to institutional pressure: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms. Academy of Management Journal, 63(6), 2004-2032, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0557.en_US
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectEmerging economiesen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional theoryen_US
dc.subjectPolicy environmenten_US
dc.titleA dual-agency model of firm CSR in response to institutional pressure : evidence from Chinese publicly listed firmsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage2004en_US
dc.identifier.epage2032en_US
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/amj.2018.0557en_US
dcterms.abstractFindings from prior studies regarding the relationship between government corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives and firm CSR performance have been mixed. To address this research gap, we developed a dual-agency model incorporating both public agents (government officials) and private agents (corporate CEOs) to investigate when firms respond to government initiatives by increasing their CSR. We tested our model in a sample of 746 Chinese listed firms during the period 2009-2014 when a national CSR initiative, the Twelfth Five-Year Plan, took place. Our results show that firms responded positively to the plan by increasing their CSR performance, but their response varied according to the incentives of both public and private CSR agents. Firms were more likely to increase CSR when public agents were more motivated to seek promotion to the central government or when private agents had greater concerns for legitimacy. Our examination of the role of two different types of CSR agents within institutions contributes to the institutional view of CSR by highlighting the interplay of institutions and human agents in promoting firm CSR. It also advances public policy and managerial practices regarding the development and selection of CSR agents inside and outside firms in a given institutional environment.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAcademy of Management journal, Dec. 2020, v. 63, no. 6, p. 2004-2032en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAcademy of Management journalen_US
dcterms.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091954921-
dc.description.validate202301 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberMM-0047-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextChina Europe International Business Schoolen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS55189048-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Li_Dual-Agency_Model_Firm.pdfPre-Published version1.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

117
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

1,431
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

154
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

102
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.