Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/96864
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometryen_US
dc.creatorThite, Nen_US
dc.creatorDesiato, Aen_US
dc.creatorShinde, Len_US
dc.creatorWolffsohm, JSen_US
dc.creatorNaroo, SAen_US
dc.creatorSantodomingo Rubido, Jen_US
dc.creatorCho, Pen_US
dc.creatorJones, Den_US
dc.creatorVilla-Collar, Cen_US
dc.creatorCarrillo, Gen_US
dc.creatorChan, Oen_US
dc.creatorWang, Hen_US
dc.creatorIomdina, Een_US
dc.creatorTarutta, Een_US
dc.creatorProskurina, Oen_US
dc.creatorFan, CSen_US
dc.creatorZeri, Fen_US
dc.creatorBakkar, MMen_US
dc.creatorBarodawala, Fen_US
dc.creatorDabral, Nen_US
dc.creatorLafosse, Een_US
dc.creatorLee, Cen_US
dc.creatorNichols, Jen_US
dc.creatorChan, Jen_US
dc.creatorPark, Ken_US
dc.creatorNair, Ven_US
dc.creatorvan der Worp, Een_US
dc.creatorVankudre, Gen_US
dc.creatorMaseedupally, Ven_US
dc.creatorBhattarai, Yen_US
dc.creatorNagzarkar, Den_US
dc.creatorBrauer, Pen_US
dc.creatorGil-Cazorla, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T03:09:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-22T03:09:17Z-
dc.identifier.issn1542-2321en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/96864-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsThis item is Open Accessen_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Thite, Nilesh M.Optom; Desiato, Alfredo B.Sc; Shinde, Lakshmi M.Sc; Wolffsohm, James S Ph.D; Naroo, Shehzad A. Ph.D; Santodomingo Rubido, Jacinto Ph.D; Cho, Pauline Ph.D; Jones, Debbie B.Sc; Villa-Collar, Cesar Ph.D; Carrillo, Guillermo B.Optom; Chan, Osbert Ph.D; Wang, Haiying Ph.D; Iomdina, Elena Ph.D; Tarutta, Elena M.D., Ph.D; Proskurina, Olga M.D., Ph.D; Fan, Chi Shing Ph.D; Zeri, Fabrizio Ph.D; Bakkar, May M. Ph.D; Barodawala, Fakhruddin M.Optom; Dabral, Neeraj M.Optom; Lafosse, Edouard Ph.D; Lee, Cheni M.Optom; Nichols, Jason M.Optom; Chan, Jack B.Optom; Park, Kyounghee M.Optom; Nair, Vishakh M.Optom; van der Worp, Eef Ph.D; Vankudre, Gopi M.Optom; Maseedupally, Vinod Ph.D; Bhattarai, Yashaswee B.Optom; Nagzarkar, Dimple B.Optom; Brauer, Peter B.Optom; Gil-Cazorla, Raquel Ph.D. Differences in Practitioner Experience, Practice Type, and Profession in Attitudes Toward Growing Contact Lens Practice. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice 48(9):p 369-376, September 2022 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000920en_US
dc.subjectContact lens practiceen_US
dc.subjectContact lens practitionersen_US
dc.subjectInterventionsen_US
dc.subjectAttitudesen_US
dc.titleDifferences in practitioner experience, practice type, and profession in attitudes toward growing contact lens practiceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage369en_US
dc.identifier.epage376en_US
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ICL.0000000000000920en_US
dcterms.abstractObjective: To investigate eye care practitioners' attitudes and perceptions toward potential interventions that can enhance contact lens (CL) practice across the world, and how this is influenced by their practice setting.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: A self-administered, anonymized survey was constructed in English and then forward and backward translated into six more languages. The survey was distributed online via social media platforms and mailing lists involving reputed international professional bodies.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: In total, 2,222 responses from 27 countries with sufficient responses were analyzed (53% females, median age- 37 years). Most of the respondents were optometrists (81.9%) and 47.6% were from stand-alone/independent practices. Median working experience in CL prescribing was 11.0 years (IQR: 18.0, 4–22 years). Over two-third of them declared themselves to be very hopeful (22.9%) or hopeful (45.1%) about the future of their CL practice. Among the potential interventions proposed, continuous update of knowledge and skills and competently managing CL-related complications were rated the most important (median score: 9/10 for each). Practitioners working in national/regional retail chains expressed higher proactivity in recommending CLs (9/10) than those in local chains, hospitals, and universities (for all 8/10, P<0.05). National differences were also identified in eye care practitioner attitudes and perceptions (P<0.05).en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The study provided important information to delineate a variety of elements characterizing CL practice across the world. These insights can serve as a basis to design strategies at national and international levels.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEye and contact lens, Sept 2022, v. 48, no. 9, p. 369-376en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEye and contact lensen_US
dcterms.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000843918900004-
dc.identifier.pmid35971228-
dc.description.validate202212 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1696-n04-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Differences_in_Practitioner_Experience_Practice_4.pdf255.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

155
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

179
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.