Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/96193
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorAu, AKYen_US
dc.creatorNg, JCKen_US
dc.creatorChen, SXen_US
dc.creatorWu, WCHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-14T04:06:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-14T04:06:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn1099-9809en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/96193-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dc.rights© American Psychological Association, 2022. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000560en_US
dc.subjectEthnic minoritiesen_US
dc.subjectGlobal orientationsen_US
dc.subjectIntegration policiesen_US
dc.subjectMixed methodsen_US
dc.subjectSequential explanatoryen_US
dc.titleRelationships between global orientations and attitudes toward integration policies : a sequential explanatory mixed methods approachen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage260en_US
dc.identifier.epage272en_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/cdp0000560en_US
dcterms.abstractObjectives: Based upon a mixed methods follow-up explanation model, the present research examined the relationships between global orientations and the attitudes toward integration policies among both locals (majority group) and South Asians (minority group) in Hong Kong.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: In Study 1, quantitative data were collected from a community sample of 1,614 adults comprising 1,007 locals and 607 South Asians in three minority groups (Indians, Nepalese, and Pakistanis). In Study 2, a follow-up explanation phase of qualitative investigation was conducted, with 12 in-depth semistructured focus group discussions among seven locals and 49 South Asians, generating three main themes and six subthemes.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Quantitative results showed that the positive link between multicultural acquisition and instrumental integration policies was significantly stronger for South Asians than for locals, and that ethnic protection was negatively associated with a positive attitude toward symbolic integration policies in the majority group but had no effects in the minority group. The three main themes generated from the qualitative results include alleviating minority disadvantage, preserving majority privilege, and embracing diversity for the common good.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The combined quantitative and qualitative results suggest that the differential relationships of multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection with support for specific integration policies can be understood with the underlying structural power asymmetry between the majority and minority groupsen_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology, Apr. 2024, v. 30, no. 2, p. 260-272en_US
dcterms.isPartOfCultural diversity & ethnic minority psychologyen_US
dcterms.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139331629-
dc.identifier.pmid36107645-
dc.identifier.eissn1939-0106en_US
dc.description.validate202211 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B3-0369-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPublic Policy Research Funding Scheme (PolyU5006-PPR-11)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cultural_Tug_War.pdfPre-Published version1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

70
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Downloads

137
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.