Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/96169
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorAhrens, Ken_US
dc.creatorJiang, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-11T07:56:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-11T07:56:50Z-
dc.identifier.issn1092-6488en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/96169-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPsychology Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLCen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Metaphor and Symbol on 03 Feb 2020 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783.en_US
dc.titleSource domain verification using corpus-based toolsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage43en_US
dc.identifier.epage55en_US
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783en_US
dcterms.abstractSource domain verification has not received as much attention as criteria for metaphor identification in the study of conceptual metaphor. In this paper, we provide a replicable approach to source domain verification which we hope will provide a foundation for new approaches to this important question. We adopt an empirical method extended from previous research that used corpus-based linguistic tools such as SUMO (Suggested Upper Merged Ontology), WordNet, collocational patterns and an online dictionary. We present a new, step-by-step procedure to verify which keywords may be categorized in the source domain of building, using data from the Corpus of Hong Kong Political Speeches which contains parsed Chinese-language speeches by Hong Kong Chief Executives of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (1997–2014). Following the verification of a number of keywords in the building source domain, we discuss how this method may be adapted for other source domains and languages and discuss its application to various areas of study within metaphor research as well as the current limitations of this approach.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMetaphor and symbol, 2020, v. 35, no. 1, p. 43-55en_US
dcterms.isPartOfMetaphor and symbolen_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079128521-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-7868en_US
dc.description.validate202211 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B3-1039-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ahrens_Source_Domain_Verification.pdfPre-Published version575.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

73
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Downloads

177
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

37
Citations as of Oct 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

32
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.