Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/96039
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorYang, Cen_US
dc.creatorCheng, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-01T03:39:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-01T03:39:16Z-
dc.identifier.issn0022-460Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/96039-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2015. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yang, C., & Cheng, L. (2016). Sound absorption of microperforated panels inside compact acoustic enclosures. Journal of sound and vibration, 360, 140-155 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.09.024en_US
dc.titleSound absorption of microperforated panels inside compact acoustic enclosuresen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage140en_US
dc.identifier.epage155en_US
dc.identifier.volume360en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsv.2015.09.024en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper investigates the sound absorption effect of microperforated panels (MPPs) in small-scale enclosures, an effort stemming from the recent interests in using MPPs for noise control in compact mechanical systems. Two typical MPP backing cavity configurations (an empty backing cavity and a honeycomb backing structure) are studied. Although both configurations provide basically the same sound absorption curves from standard impedance tube measurements, their in situ sound absorption properties, when placed inside a small enclosure, are drastically different. This phenomenon is explained using a simple system model based on modal analyses. It is shown that the accurate prediction of the in situ sound absorption of the MPPs inside compact acoustic enclosures requires meticulous consideration of the configuration of the backing cavity and its coupling with the enclosure in front. The MPP structure should be treated as part of the entire system, rather than an absorption boundary characterized by the surface impedance, calculated or measured in simple acoustic environment. Considering the spatial matching between the acoustic fields across the MPP, the possibility of attenuating particular enclosure resonances by partially covering the enclosure wall with a properly designed MPP structure is also demonstrated.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of sound and vibration, 6 Jan. 2016, v. 360, p. 140-155en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of sound and vibrationen_US
dcterms.issued2016-01-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84944324155-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8568en_US
dc.description.validate202211 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberME-1093-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6585844-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cheng_Sound_Absorption_Microperforated.pdfPre-Published version959.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

67
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

128
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

62
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

43
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.