Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95995
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorYang, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-01T03:37:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-01T03:37:46Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-988-8439-60-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95995-
dc.description2018 International Conference on Bilingual Learning and Teaching ICBLT, 25-27 October 2018, Hong Kong, Chinaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Open University of Hong Kongen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © individual authors, 2019en_US
dc.rightsAll rights reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the individual copyright holder.en_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectIntercultural communicationen_US
dc.subjectComputer-mediated communicationen_US
dc.subjectInteractional approachen_US
dc.subjectPolitenessen_US
dc.subjectDisagreementen_US
dc.titleThe use of disagreement strategies on Chinese forums : comparing Hong Kong and Mainland Chinaen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage26en_US
dc.identifier.epage31en_US
dcterms.abstractPrior research on disagreement has mainly focused on its negative impact, suggesting that disagreement should be avoided in communication. Consequently, disagreement is rarely studied in computer-mediated communication, particularly in the Chinese context. Adopting the interactional approach, this project pioneers the investigation of disagreement strategies on online forums in Hong Kong and mainland China, in hopes of providing insights into a better understanding of disagreement in the Chinese online context and shedding light on politeness theory in intercultural communication among Chinese people. Two threads on a similar topic were selected, from which 400 comments were collected and annotated for further analysis. Our results showed that, instead of being a face-threatening act, disagreement maintained and enhanced the interlocutors’ face and advanced the communication of information within each thread. Moreover, although the distribution of the five disagreement strategies was similar in the two sites, there were notably more disagreement tokens and negative comments on the Hong Kong forum. The observed divergence has been attributed to the different degrees of collectivism–individualism in the two regions, the internet censorship in mainland China and the nature of the two forums selected, which remain to be confirmed in future studies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn The 2018 International Conference on Bilingual Learning and Teaching : E-proceedings, p. 26-31. Hong Kong: The Open University of Hong Kong, 2018en_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.relation.ispartofbookThe 2018 International Conference on Bilingual Learning and Teaching : E-proceedingsen_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Bilingual Learning and Teaching [ICBLT]en_US
dc.publisher.placeHong Kongen_US
dc.description.validate202211 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1328, CBS-0273en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID44608-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS27621635en_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yang_Disagreement_Chinese_Forums.pdf1.88 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

58
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Downloads

5
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.