Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95792
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Managementen_US
dc.creatorShin, HHen_US
dc.creatorJeong, Men_US
dc.creatorZapata-Cuervo, Nen_US
dc.creatorMontes Guerra, MIen_US
dc.creatorCho, MHen_US
dc.creatorKim, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T01:09:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-11T01:09:33Z-
dc.identifier.issn0959-6119en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95792-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.rights© Emerald Publishing Limited. This AAM is provided for your own personal use only. It may not be used for resale, reprinting, systematic distribution, emailing, or for any other commercial purpose without the permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hailey Shin, H., Jeong, M., Zapata-Cuervo, N., Montes Guerra, M.I., Cho, M.-H. and Kim, Y. (2023), "Effects of customers’ perceived risks of sharing economy on self-protective behavior toward COVID-19", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 1304-1331 is published by Emerald and is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2021-1547.en_US
dc.subjectPerceived risken_US
dc.subjectSharing economyen_US
dc.subjectBehavior intentionen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectSelf-protective behavioren_US
dc.titleEffects of customers’ perceived risks of sharing economy on self-protective behavior toward COVID-19en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1304en_US
dc.identifier.epage1331en_US
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJCHM-12-2021-1547en_US
dcterms.abstractPurpose: This study aims to investigate how customers’ perceived risks of sharing economy (SE) affect their self-protective behaviors when using SE, leading to their future behavioral intention. Additionally, this study looks into whether there are any differences between accommodation-sharing and ride-sharing customers in the aforementioned relationships.en_US
dcterms.abstractDesign/methodology/approach: An online survey targeting two groups of SE customers (i.e. accommodation sharing and ride sharing) was used. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling, the mechanism of how SE customers’ perceived risks of SE affect their self-protective behaviors, which in turn influence their future behavior intention. A multigroup analysis was performed to assess the difference between the two groups of SE customers. Finally, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to see the potential differences between the five classifications of self-protective behaviors in their perceived risks.en_US
dcterms.abstractFindings: SE customers’ psychological risks positively affected their hygiene protective behaviors and social protective behaviors, influencing their behavior intention and relative intention (compared with traditional services). Social risk had a negative impact on SE customers’ hygiene protective behaviors. There was a significant difference between accommodation sharing and ride sharing customers in their psychological mechanism of how perceived risks influence their self-protective behaviors.en_US
dcterms.abstractPractical implications: The findings of this study help SE platforms and service providers better understand their customers’ perceived risks of their services and suggest them to promote their customers’ self-protective behaviors so that perceived risks can be mitigated, thereby generating strong behavior intentions. As the results indicated that there is a significant difference between the two major forms of SE (i.e. accommodation sharing and ride sharing) in their customers’ perceived risks and self-protective behavior, SE platforms can further refine their operational and marketing efforts based on the findings.en_US
dcterms.abstractOriginality/value: This study offers a comprehensive understanding of SE customers’ self-protective behaviors by examining the effects of SE customers’ different perceived risks on their self-protective behaviors during the unprecedented pandemic. Furthermore, the comparison of the two most popular forms of SE (i.e. accommodation sharing and ride sharing) provides new perspectives to understand customers’ behavior in the SE context.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of contemporary hospitality management, 2023, v. 35, no. 4, p. 1304-1331en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of contemporary hospitality managementen_US
dcterms.issued2023-
dc.identifier.eissn1757-1049en_US
dc.description.validate202210 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1769-
dc.identifier.SubFormID45916-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shin_Customers_Perceived_Risks.pdfPre-Published version607.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

74
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

Downloads

55
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Jun 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.