Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95550
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.creatorLiao, Zen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Wen_US
dc.creatorLi, Xen_US
dc.creatorSong, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T01:40:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-21T01:40:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95550-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dc.rights© American Psychological Association, 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000371.en_US
dc.subjectEpisodic transactionsen_US
dc.subjectLMX relationshipen_US
dc.subjectMomentary sense of obligation to reciprocateen_US
dc.subjectResource contributionsen_US
dc.subjectState work engagementen_US
dc.titleGive and take : an episodic perspective on leader-member exchangeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage34en_US
dc.identifier.epage51en_US
dc.identifier.volume104en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/apl0000371en_US
dcterms.abstractResearch on leader-member exchange (LMX) has predominantly taken a dyadic relationship perspective to understand the differences in overall exchanges across leader-member dyads, while neglecting the within-dyad exchange dynamics across a series of episodic resource transactions. Drawing from the literature on equity and reciprocity principles of social exchange, we develop and test a model of leader-member episodic resource transactions that delineates the momentary psychological mechanism and the boundary condition under which episodic resource contribution surplus generates member subsequent reciprocations. Multilevel polynomial regression analyses of 600 episodic exchange responses from 73 employees show that resource contribution surplus in an exchange episode increased state work engagement immediately following the episode and member resource contribution in the next episode by evoking member momentary sense of obligation to reciprocate. Additionally, the betweendyad LMX relationship quality attenuated these effects by reducing the likelihood to feel obligated to reciprocate due to episodic resource contribution surplus. Our research highlights the microdynamic transaction nature of the exchanges between leaders and members and provides insight into how leader-member dyads exchange resources in episodic interactions.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of applied psychology, Jan. 2019, v. 104, no. 1, p. 34-51en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of applied psychologyen_US
dcterms.issued2019-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057279716-
dc.identifier.pmid30474999-
dc.identifier.eissn1939-1854en_US
dc.description.validate202209_bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberMM-0161-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS22378699-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liu_Give_And_Take.pdfPre-Published Version2.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

110
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Downloads

32
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
Citations as of Oct 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

56
Citations as of Oct 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.