Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95520
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studies-
dc.creatorZhu, Len_US
dc.creatorLi, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T01:40:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-21T01:40:06Z-
dc.identifier.issn1325-5029en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95520-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Law Association, Australian Branchen_US
dc.rights© International Law Association - Australian Branch, 2018-
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the publisher.-
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the following article: Zhu, L., & Li, X. (2018). A survey of the jurisdiction rules in unimodal transport conventions and their impact on international multimodal transport of goods contracts. Austl. Int'l LJ, 25, 213.-
dc.titleA survey of the jurisdiction rules in unimodal transport conventions and their impact on international multimodal transport of goods contractsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage213en_US
dc.identifier.epage226en_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue2018en_US
dcterms.abstractGiven the fact that uniform liability rules for international multimodal transport contracts of goods are still lacking, it is important to undertake a holistic study of the rules for resolving issues that may arise relating both to jurisdiction and to dispute resolutions in a contract for the international multimodal transport of goods. This article thus carries out a general survey of jurisdiction rules in the unimodal transport conventions and discusses the possible impacts of those rules on international multimodal transport of goods contracts. It concludes that, unless the parties have clear and unequivocal agreements in their contracts, a set of jurisdiction rules for contracts for the multimodal transport of goods is both necessary and important.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAustralian international law journal, Jan. 2018, v. 25, no. 2018, p. 213-226en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAustralian international law journalen_US
dcterms.issued2018-01-
dc.identifier.eissn1839-2687en_US
dc.description.validate202209 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscript-
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B2-0596, LMS-0289-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGC-
dc.description.pubStatusPublished-
dc.identifier.OPUS24478424-
dc.description.oaCategoryPublisher permissionen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhu_Survey_Jurisdiction_Rules.pdfPre-Published version361.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

77
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Downloads

46
Citations as of Oct 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.