Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95518
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies | en_US |
dc.creator | Zhang, M | en_US |
dc.creator | Zhu, L | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-21T01:39:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-21T01:39:12Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-0600 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95518 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sweet and Maxwell Asia | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2018 by Sweet & Maxwell; Mingzhao Zhang and Ling Zhu | en_US |
dc.rights | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Hong Kong law journal following peer review. The definitive published version Zhang, M., & Zhu, L. (2018). Understanding Who Has an Insurable Interest in Goods under Multimodal Transport in Chinese Law. Hong Kong LJ, 48, 739 is available online on Westlaw UK (http://legalresearch.westlaw.co.uk/). | en_US |
dc.rights | This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) | en_US |
dc.title | Understanding who has an insurable interest in goods under multimodal transport in Chinese law | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 739 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 762 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 48 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | The insurable interest doctrine is a long-established principle that distinguishes insurance policies from gambling. However, the current statutory provisions in China on insurable interest are too vague to determine whether a specific interest is insurable. To guide judicial practice, this doctrine was reinforced with an interpretation by the Supreme People’s Court. Despite efforts made, though, current rules are still not entirely satisfactory for determining clearly who has an insurable interest under Chinese law. With the development of international commerce and multimodal transport, conflicts between the aim of preventing gambling and allowing legitimate business are increasing when applying the insurable interest doctrine. This article advocates a pecuniary interest approach to recognising the insurable interest under property insurance. By employing this approach, it attempts to clarify the rightful parties having an insurable interest in goods under multimodal transport. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Hong Kong law journal, 2018, v. 48, p. 739-762 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Hong Kong law journal | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.description.validate | 202209 bckw | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | RGC-B2-0594 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Understanding_Who_Insurable.pdf | Pre-Published version | 333.75 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
96
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
170
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.