Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95365
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorWong, SWen_US
dc.creatorDai, Yen_US
dc.creatorTang, BSen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T01:59:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-19T01:59:55Z-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95365-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wong, S. W., Dai, Y., Tang, B.-s., & Liu, J. (2021). A new model of village urbanization? Coordinative governance of state-village relations in Guangzhou City, China. Land Use Policy, 109, 105500 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105500.en_US
dc.subjectCollaborationen_US
dc.subjectLocal governanceen_US
dc.subjectPeri-urbanen_US
dc.subjectSocial welfareen_US
dc.subjectUrbanizationen_US
dc.titleA new model of village urbanization? Coordinative governance of state-village relations in Guangzhou City, Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume109en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105500en_US
dcterms.abstractChina's ongoing urbanization has profoundly reshaped local governance with an increasing emphasis on reducing urban-rural inequalities through public investment in the rural areas in order to enhance the wellbeing of villagers. Drawing from more than one decade of intensive field research in a peri-urban area of Guangzhou, our study elucidates how the process of village urbanization has developed into a tri-partite partnership between the local state, the village organizations and the villagers in village asset management and welfare provision. This collaborative model presents an alternative approach to the top-down, state-led urbanization model which has notoriously led to landless villagers and economic dispossession in village urbanization. It also differs from the bottom-up, village corporatist model which tends to oppose integrated urban-rural development. This study attempts to conceptualize the delicate interdependency of the local state, the village collectives and villagers. Our findings offer new insights into the restructuring of state-village relations and explain its implications for community capacity building in periurban China.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLand use policy, Oct. 2021, v. 109, 105500en_US
dcterms.isPartOfLand use policyen_US
dcterms.issued2021-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105800860-
dc.identifier.artn105500en_US
dc.description.validate202209 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B2-1449, BRE-0155-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextFord Foundation, USA (Grant No. 0175-1049)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS54685251-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wong_Alternative_Urbanism_New.pdfPre-Published version1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

111
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

11
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Citations as of Oct 31, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.