Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95322
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorAhrens, Ken_US
dc.creatorZeng, WHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-17T06:40:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-17T06:40:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn0378-2166en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95322-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ahrens, K., & Zeng, W. H. (2022). Referential and evaluative strategies of conceptual metaphor use in government discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 188, 83-96 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.001.en_US
dc.subjectSociopragmaticsen_US
dc.subjectCorpus-based conceptual metaphor analysisen_US
dc.subjectMapping principleen_US
dc.subjectHong Kong and PRCen_US
dc.titleReferential and evaluative strategies of conceptual metaphor use in government discourseen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage83en_US
dc.identifier.epage96en_US
dc.identifier.volume188en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.001en_US
dcterms.abstractWe undertake a corpus-based diachronic analysis in order to explore how leaders in China and Hong Kong have employed metaphors of EDUCATION in major governmental speeches and reports both before and after Hong Kong's handover from Britain to China. The results of this study demonstrate that Hong Kong SAR Chief Executives have similar patterns of source domain selections with Chinese Premiers as compared with Hong Kong Colonial Governors, indicating that the change in sovereignty brought about different ways of referring to education for the people of Hong Kong, with evaluative effects remaining positive overall. These findings demonstrate that diachronic and synchronic comparative analyses of metaphors within small, specialized corpora are useful in uncovering potential sociopragmatic shifts in how political leaders frame social issues.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of pragmatics, Jan. 2022, v. 188, p. 83-96en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of pragmaticsen_US
dcterms.issued2022-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000762436700007-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121802664-
dc.identifier.ros2021003825-
dc.description.validate202209 bcwhen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCDCF_2021-2022, a3532a-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50308-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS70597459-
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0378216621003787-main.pdf717.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

100
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

87
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.