Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95315
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorTsang, CSLen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.creatorMiller, Ten_US
dc.creatorPang, MYCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T08:33:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T08:33:07Z-
dc.identifier.issn1836-9553en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95315-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2021 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Tsang, C. S. L., Wang, S., Miller, T., & Pang, M. Y. C. (2022). Degree and pattern of dual-task interference during walking vary with component tasks in people after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of physiotherapy, 68(1), 26-36 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.12.009en_US
dc.subjectCognitive-motor interferenceen_US
dc.subjectDual-task interferenceen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleDegree and pattern of dual-task interference during walking vary with component tasks in people after stroke : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage26en_US
dc.identifier.epage36en_US
dc.identifier.volume68en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jphys.2021.12.009en_US
dcterms.abstractQuestions: What are the degree and pattern of dual-task interference during walking in people after stroke? How do these vary with disease chronicity and different component tasks in people after stroke? How does dual-task interference differ between people after stroke and people without stroke?en_US
dcterms.abstractDesign: Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies reporting gait-related dual-task interference.en_US
dcterms.abstractParticipants: People after stroke and people without stroke.en_US
dcterms.abstractOutcome measures: Measures of walking and secondary (cognitive or manual) task performance under dual-task conditions relative to those under single-task conditions.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Seventy-six studies (2,425 people after stroke and 492 people without stroke) were included. Manual and mental tracking tasks imposed the greatest dual-task interference on gait speed, although there was substantial uncertainty in these estimates. Among mental tracking tasks, the apparently least-complex task (serial 1 subtractions) induced the greatest dual-task interference (−0.17 m/s, 95% CI −0.24 to −0.10) on gait speed, although there was substantial uncertainty in these estimates. Mutual interference (decrement in both walking and secondary component task performances during dual-tasking) was the most common dual-task interference pattern. The results of the sensitivity analyses for studies involving people with chronic stroke were similar to the results of the primary analyses. The amount of dual-task interference from a mental tracking or manual task during walking was similar between people with or without stroke.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The degree and pattern of dual-task interference vary with the choice of component tasks. When evaluating limitations to functional mobility during dual-tasking conditions and in planning interventions accordingly, clinicians should select dual-task assessments that correspond to the daily habits and physical demands of people after stroke.en_US
dcterms.abstractRegistration: CRD42017059004.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of physiotherapy, Jan. 2022, v. 68, no. 1, p. 26-36en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of physiotherapyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121673411-
dc.identifier.pmid34953757-
dc.identifier.ros2021003359-
dc.identifier.eissn1836-9561en_US
dc.description.validate202209 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B2-0029, CDCF_2021-2022-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong Polytechnic University PhD studentshipsen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS68872943-
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1836955321001363-main.pdf822.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

140
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

137
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.