Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95156
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | School of Accounting and Finance | en_US |
| dc.creator | Hu, G | en_US |
| dc.creator | Lin, JC | en_US |
| dc.creator | Wong, O | en_US |
| dc.creator | Yu, M | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-14T08:32:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-09-14T08:32:27Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95156 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Hu, G., Lin, J. C., Wong, O., & Yu, M. (2019). Why have many US-listed Chinese firms announced delisting recently?. Global Finance Journal, 41, 13-31 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.10.002. | en_US |
| dc.subject | ADR and CDR | en_US |
| dc.subject | Delisting and going private | en_US |
| dc.subject | Government policy and regulation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Share reissuance and relisting | en_US |
| dc.subject | Undervaluation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Variable interest entity | en_US |
| dc.title | Why have many U.S.-listed Chinese firms announced delisting recently? | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 13 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 31 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 41 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.gfj.2018.10.002 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | In this study, we propose a new rationale for firms' delisting and going private decision: voluntary delist then reissue shares and relist in the “home” country, because of favorable government economic policy and regulatory changes. 29 (27) out of 127 U.S.-listed Chinese ADRs announced going private during 2015 alone (2011–14). Using these two waves of Chinese ADRs going private, we first examine three potential rationales proposed by prior literature, namely, undervaluation, free cash flows and cash holdings, and financial visibility. We find support for them generally, especially for the undervaluation hypothesis. More importantly, we provide evidences supporting our new rationale: government policy changes, which played a significant role in the 2015 wave of Chinese ADRs going private. Overall, our study highlights intensive competition among major international stock exchanges and the importance of government policy in the modern era of increasingly inter-connected global capital markets. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Global finance journal, Aug. 2019, v. 41, p. 13-31 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Global finance journal | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2019-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85057284497 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1044-0283 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202209 bcvc | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | RGC-B2-0568 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 71471130) | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Why_Have_Many.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.51 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
89
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
209
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
12
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
5
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



