Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95156
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Financeen_US
dc.creatorHu, Gen_US
dc.creatorLin, JCen_US
dc.creatorWong, Oen_US
dc.creatorYu, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T08:32:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T08:32:27Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95156-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hu, G., Lin, J. C., Wong, O., & Yu, M. (2019). Why have many US-listed Chinese firms announced delisting recently?. Global Finance Journal, 41, 13-31 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.10.002.en_US
dc.subjectADR and CDRen_US
dc.subjectDelisting and going privateen_US
dc.subjectGovernment policy and regulationen_US
dc.subjectShare reissuance and relistingen_US
dc.subjectUndervaluationen_US
dc.subjectVariable interest entityen_US
dc.titleWhy have many U.S.-listed Chinese firms announced delisting recently?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage13en_US
dc.identifier.epage31en_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gfj.2018.10.002en_US
dcterms.abstractIn this study, we propose a new rationale for firms' delisting and going private decision: voluntary delist then reissue shares and relist in the “home” country, because of favorable government economic policy and regulatory changes. 29 (27) out of 127 U.S.-listed Chinese ADRs announced going private during 2015 alone (2011–14). Using these two waves of Chinese ADRs going private, we first examine three potential rationales proposed by prior literature, namely, undervaluation, free cash flows and cash holdings, and financial visibility. We find support for them generally, especially for the undervaluation hypothesis. More importantly, we provide evidences supporting our new rationale: government policy changes, which played a significant role in the 2015 wave of Chinese ADRs going private. Overall, our study highlights intensive competition among major international stock exchanges and the importance of government policy in the modern era of increasingly inter-connected global capital markets.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGlobal finance journal, Aug. 2019, v. 41, p. 13-31en_US
dcterms.isPartOfGlobal finance journalen_US
dcterms.issued2019-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057284497-
dc.identifier.eissn1044-0283en_US
dc.description.validate202209 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B2-0568-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 71471130)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Why_Have_Many.pdfPre-Published version1.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

89
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

209
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.