Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95135
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorTang, CSen_US
dc.creatorWang, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhao, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T08:32:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T08:32:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn2365-6395en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95135-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Chamen_US
dc.rights© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the book chapter has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81423-6_15.en_US
dc.subjectFarm subsidiesen_US
dc.subjectIncome inequalityen_US
dc.subjectSocially responsible operationsen_US
dc.titleInput- vs. output-based farm subsidies in developing economies : farmer welfare and income inequalityen_US
dc.typeBook Chapteren_US
dc.identifier.spage265en_US
dc.identifier.epage286en_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-81423-6_15en_US
dcterms.abstractTo alleviate farmer poverty in developing economies, two common farmer subsidy schemes are either input-based that intends to reduce farmers’ input purchasing costs or output-based that aims to lower farmers’ output processing costs. By analyzing a stylized model that captures yield heterogeneity across farmers who engage in quantity competition, we find that both schemes can improve farmers’ income. However, these two schemes generate different effects. First, the input-based subsidy scheme narrows the income gap between farmers, but the output-based scheme widens this gap. Second, the output-based subsidy scheme outperforms the input-based subsidy scheme in terms of total farmer income and farmer productivity. Overall, we find that low-yield farmers prefer input-based subsidies, while high-yield farmers prefer output-based subsidies. These results continue to hold even when the farmer’s yield rate is uncertain.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSpringer series in supply chain management, 2021, v. 12, p. 265-286en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSpringer series in supply chain managementen_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121393257-
dc.identifier.eissn2365-6409en_US
dc.description.validate202209 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B2-1145-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Impact_Input_Output-based.pdfPre-Published version451.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

120
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Dec 22, 2024

Downloads

138
Citations as of Dec 22, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.