Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95134
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorWong, SWen_US
dc.creatorTang, BSen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T08:32:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T08:32:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn0096-1442en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95134-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications, Inc.en_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Wong SW, Tang B, Liu J. Rethinking China’s Rural Revitalization from a Historical Perspective. Journal of Urban History. 2022;48(3):565-577. © The Author(s) 2020. doi:10.1177/0096144220952091.en_US
dc.subjectChinese citiesen_US
dc.subjectDualist systemen_US
dc.subjectUrbanizationen_US
dc.subjectUrban–rural relationshipen_US
dc.subjectVillage societyen_US
dc.titleRethinking China’s rural revitalization from a historical perspectiveen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage565en_US
dc.identifier.epage577en_US
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0096144220952091en_US
dcterms.abstractRural revitalization calls for a new type of urban–rural relations in urbanizing China. Although the importance of urban–rural dichotomy has received increasing attention by scholars interested in studying urban development and governance in contemporary China, their interpretations about the connection between urban and rural areas remain fragmented and ambiguous. This article seeks to trace the origin of the Chinese city and its relations with the countryside in the imperial era. It generates a more complete understanding of the rural–urban relationship in the traditional Chinese society and to appeal for a more rounded research agenda for the Chinese urbanization based on a sound historical perspective. The findings of this study explain why and how the traditional urban–rural continuum has disappeared in contemporary China, and identifies the key lessons and wisdoms that we can borrow from the imperial era when we come to tackle the present urban–rural development.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of urban history, May 2022, v. 48, no. 3, p. 565-577en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of urban historyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089985062-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-6771en_US
dc.description.validate202209 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B2-1450, BRE-0448-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextFord Foundationen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS54685690-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rethinking_China_Rural.pdfPre-Published version916.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

176
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

387
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
Citations as of May 15, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
Citations as of May 15, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.