Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94957
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometryen_US
dc.creatorSum, RWen_US
dc.creatorWoo, GCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-05T01:42:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-05T01:42:01Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94957-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAME Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Sum, R. W., & Woo, G. C. (2022). Subjective refractions determined by Dyop ® and LogMAR chart as fixation targets. Annals of Eye Science, v.7 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aes-22-17en_US
dc.subjectDyopen_US
dc.subjectDynamic optotypeen_US
dc.subjectVisual acuityen_US
dc.subjectSubjective refractionen_US
dc.titleSubjective refractions determined by Dyop ® and LogMAR chart as fixation targetsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage8en_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/aes-22-17en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Dyop® is a dynamic optotype with a rotating and segmented visual stimulus. It can be used for visual acuity and refractive error measurement. The objective of the study was to compare refractive error measurement using the Dyop® acuity and LogMAR E charts.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Fifty subjects aged 18 or above with aided visual acuity better than 6/12 were recruited. Refractive error was measured by subjective refraction methods using the Dyop® acuity chart and LogMAR E charts and the duration of measurement compared. Thibo’s notation was used to represent the refractive error obtained for analysis.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: There was no significant difference in terms of spherical equivalent (M) (P=0.96) or J0 (P=0.78) and J45 (P=0.51) components measured using the Dyop® acuity and LogMAR E charts. However, subjective refraction measurement was significantly faster using the Dyop® acuity chart (t=4.46, P<0.05), with an average measurement time of 419.90±91.17 versus 452.04±74.71 seconds using the LogMAR E chart.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: Accuracy of refractive error measurement using a Dyop® chart was comparable with use of a LogMAR E chart. The dynamic optotype Dyop® could be considered as an alternative fixation target to be used in subjective refraction.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnnals of eye science, 15 Dec. 2022, v. 7, 34, p.1-8en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAnnals of eye scienceen_US
dcterms.issued2022-12-15-
dc.identifier.eissn2520-4122en_US
dc.identifier.artn34en_US
dc.description.validate202209 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1695-n01, a1879-
dc.identifier.SubFormID46071-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
6960-PB12-1704-R2.pdf828.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

97
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

46
Citations as of May 11, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.