Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94875
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Computingen_US
dc.creatorYuen, KKFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-30T08:34:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-30T08:34:16Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94875-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00628-3.en_US
dc.subjectInformation system engineeringen_US
dc.subjectPairwise comparisonen_US
dc.subjectPrimitive cognitive network processen_US
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy processen_US
dc.subjectPROMETHEEen_US
dc.titleDecision models for information systems planning using primitive cognitive network process : comparisons with analytic hierarchy processen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1759en_US
dc.identifier.epage1785en_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12351-021-00628-3en_US
dcterms.abstractThe well-planned investment in a robust Information System (IS) is essential for the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage. The careful selection of a suitable adoption plan for the IS investment is vital, especially in the early preparedness stage of a system development life cycle (SDLC), as this has a long-lasting impact on the SDLC. The selection process involves a complex, multiple criteria decision making process. The adoption of a multiple criteria decision tool, the Primitive Cognitive Network Process (PCNP), an alternative of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), can be challenging due to the minor differences among objects which are not appropriately evaluated by multiplication or ratio. This commonly results in rating judgement that occurs during the selection of alternatives. To address the challenges with IS planning, this paper proposes the use of the PCNP in various decision models. Three established studies of IS projects using the AHP are revisited using the proposed PCNP to demonstrate the feasibility and usability of the PCNP. The paper discusses data conversion from the AHP to the PCNP, its merits, and limitations. The proposed method can be a applied as an alternative decision tool for IS planning for various projects including Artificial Intelligence adoption projects, cloud sourcing planning projects, and mobile deployment projects.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOperational research, July 2022, v. 22, no. 3, p. 1759-1785en_US
dcterms.isPartOfOperational researchen_US
dcterms.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000625046100001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132184571-
dc.identifier.eissn1866-1505en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1429-
dc.identifier.SubFormID44969-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yuen2021_Decision_Models_For_Information_Systems_Planning .pdfPre-Published version1.61 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

61
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

68
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.