Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94875
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Computing | en_US |
| dc.creator | Yuen, KKF | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-30T08:34:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-30T08:34:16Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94875 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.rights | © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 | en_US |
| dc.rights | This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00628-3. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Information system engineering | en_US |
| dc.subject | Pairwise comparison | en_US |
| dc.subject | Primitive cognitive network process | en_US |
| dc.subject | Analytic hierarchy process | en_US |
| dc.subject | PROMETHEE | en_US |
| dc.title | Decision models for information systems planning using primitive cognitive network process : comparisons with analytic hierarchy process | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1759 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1785 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 22 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12351-021-00628-3 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | The well-planned investment in a robust Information System (IS) is essential for the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage. The careful selection of a suitable adoption plan for the IS investment is vital, especially in the early preparedness stage of a system development life cycle (SDLC), as this has a long-lasting impact on the SDLC. The selection process involves a complex, multiple criteria decision making process. The adoption of a multiple criteria decision tool, the Primitive Cognitive Network Process (PCNP), an alternative of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), can be challenging due to the minor differences among objects which are not appropriately evaluated by multiplication or ratio. This commonly results in rating judgement that occurs during the selection of alternatives. To address the challenges with IS planning, this paper proposes the use of the PCNP in various decision models. Three established studies of IS projects using the AHP are revisited using the proposed PCNP to demonstrate the feasibility and usability of the PCNP. The paper discusses data conversion from the AHP to the PCNP, its merits, and limitations. The proposed method can be a applied as an alternative decision tool for IS planning for various projects including Artificial Intelligence adoption projects, cloud sourcing planning projects, and mobile deployment projects. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Operational research, July 2022, v. 22, no. 3, p. 1759-1785 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Operational research | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2022-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000625046100001 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85132184571 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1866-1505 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202208 bckw | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a1429 | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 44969 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yuen2021_Decision_Models_For_Information_Systems_Planning .pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.61 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
61
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
68
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



