Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94823
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorKwong, Een_US
dc.creatorNg, KWKen_US
dc.creatorLeung, MTen_US
dc.creatorZheng, YPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-30T07:33:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-30T07:33:06Z-
dc.identifier.issn0179-051Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94823-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10179-y.en_US
dc.subjectBiofeedbacken_US
dc.subjectDeglutition disordersen_US
dc.subjectMotor learningen_US
dc.subjectSurface electromyography (sEMG)en_US
dc.subjectSwallowing maneuveren_US
dc.subjectUltrasounden_US
dc.titleApplication of ultrasound biofeedback to the learning of the Mendelsohn maneuver in non-dysphagic adults : a pilot studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage650en_US
dc.identifier.epage658en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00455-020-10179-yen_US
dcterms.abstractThis study aimed to investigate the application of ultrasound to the learning of swallowing maneuver. Forty non-dysphagic adults of both genders who were naïve to the Mendelsohn maneuver participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound or surface electromyography (sEMG) as biofeedback when acquiring the Mendelsohn maneuver. Thirty-eight subjects (n = 19) completed the Learning phase. Accuracy of executing the Mendelsohn maneuver was measured immediately (Post-training percentage accuracy) and one week post-training (Retention percentage accuracy). Whereas comparable numbers of training blocks were completed by the two groups (t(31.51) = 3.68, p = 0.330), the Ultrasound group attained significantly higher percentage accuracies than the sEMG group at both Post-training (t(28.88) = 4.04, p < 0.001, d = 1.309) and Retention (t(30.78) = 2.13, p = 0.042, d = 0.690). Ultrasound is a more effective biofeedback than sEMG in the acquisition of the Mendelsohn maneuver and may be adopted to the rehabilitative treatment for dysphagic individuals. Non-specificity of sEMG as biofeedback should be emphasized when it is employed in the training and learning of swallowing maneuvers. Findings from the present study suggest that ultrasound is preferable to sEMG as biofeedback in the learning of the Mendelsohn maneuver.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDysphagia, Aug. 2021, v. 36, no. 4, p. 650-658en_US
dcterms.isPartOfDysphagiaen_US
dcterms.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090121668-
dc.identifier.pmid32889626-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-0460en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1323, CBS-0100en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID44565-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS51639912en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kwong_Ultrasound_Mendelsohn_Maneuver.pdfPre-Published version1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

123
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

317
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
Citations as of May 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.