Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94711
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorDaly, JSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-30T07:28:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-30T07:28:59Z-
dc.identifier.issn1035-0330en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94711-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Social Semiotics on 23 Feb 2022 (Published online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10350330.2022.2041364.en_US
dc.subjectFactual welfare televisionen_US
dc.subjectMultimodal critical discourse studiesen_US
dc.subjectNeoliberalismen_US
dc.subjectPost-welfarismen_US
dc.subjectReality TVen_US
dc.subjectSocial classen_US
dc.titleThe selective foregrounding of social structures in factual welfare television : a multimodal analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage21en_US
dc.identifier.epage39en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10350330.2022.2041364en_US
dcterms.abstractFactual welfare television has been described as stigmatising and individualising–representing its participants as failures in a meritocratic society. This paper, however, revisits the 2014 British documentary Benefits Street and argues that it tends to humanise its cast, showing them as trapped in two social structures of benefits (i.e. the social security system) and street (i.e. the deprived local community). Using a multimodal critical discourse studies approach, the paper analyses the verbal, visual and sound tracks of the most popular episode to explore how these modes combine to portray the structure of benefits as stultifying, and the street as a restrictive community. These structures are selectively foregrounded at the expense of the wider, arguably more impactful structures of neoliberal austerity and welfare reform that characterised the political economy of Britain in 2014. The residents’ troubles, therefore, appear to be grounded in the two restrictive structures of benefits and street, and individualistic post-welfarism–surely implicated in their problems–becomes the solution.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSocial semiotics, 2024, v. 34, no. 1, p. 21-39en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSocial semioticsen_US
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125722726-
dc.description.validate202208 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1402-
dc.identifier.SubFormID44851-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Daly_Selective_Foregrounding_Television.pdfPre-Published version1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

135
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026

Downloads

272
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of May 8, 2026

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Apr 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.