Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94705
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorOlawumi, TOen_US
dc.creatorChan, DWMen_US
dc.creatorChan, APCen_US
dc.creatorWong, JKWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-30T07:28:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-30T07:28:57Z-
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94705-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Olawumi, T. O., Chan, D. W. M., Chan, A. P. C., & Wong, J. K. W. (2020). Development of a building sustainability assessment method (BSAM) for developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121514 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121514.en_US
dc.subjectAssessment methoden_US
dc.subjectDeveloping countriesen_US
dc.subjectGreen buildingsen_US
dc.subjectRating systemsen_US
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of a building sustainability assessment method (BSAM) for developing countries in sub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume263en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121514en_US
dcterms.abstractThe consideration of the regional context in the development of green building rating systems is well established in the extant literature, and this informs the development of a sustainability assessment method for sub-Saharan Africa. Hence, a multi-expert consultation method was carried out in Nigeria which is the largest economy in the region. This was performed via a structured questionnaire survey and interview approaches to identify the key sustainability assessment criteria, assign score-weights to the various criteria, and establish the certification grading system of buildings. The developed Building Sustainability Assessment Method (BSAM) scheme and its weighted criteria were validated using two existing building case studies. The established BSAM scheme was compared to six widely used green building rating systems. The comparative analysis reveals that the score-weights and priorities of the BSAM scheme were remarkably different from the existing rating systems. The study findings also show the increasing focus on the indoor environmental quality and energy criteria by all the rating systems. The developed BSAM scheme, meanwhile, has adequately considered the three main pillars of sustainable development unlike the existing green rating tools. Hence, it is expected for the proposed BSAM scheme to promote greener buildings and enhance sustainable urban development in the region.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of cleaner production, 1 Aug. 2020, v. 263, 121514en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of cleaner productionen_US
dcterms.issued2020-08-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083312375-
dc.identifier.artn121514en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1400, BRE-0276-
dc.identifier.SubFormID44831-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextDepartment of Building and Real Estate and Sustainable City Laben_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24255009-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Olawumi_Development_Building_Sustainability.pdfPre-Published version2.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

162
Last Week
33
Last month
Citations as of Dec 21, 2025

Downloads

208
Citations as of Dec 21, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

34
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.