Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94603
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Yen_US
dc.creatorLin, Ren_US
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T01:54:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-25T01:54:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94603-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserveden_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Liu, Y., Lin, R., & Ren, J. (2021). Developing a life cycle composite footprint index for sustainability prioritization of sludge-to-energy alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124885 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124885.en_US
dc.subjectFuzzy analytic hierarchy processen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy best-worst methoden_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSludge treatmenten_US
dc.subjectSludge-to-energy technologyen_US
dc.subjectSustainability assessmenten_US
dc.titleDeveloping a life cycle composite footprint index for sustainability prioritization of sludge-to-energy alternativesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume281en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124885en_US
dcterms.abstractSludge-to-energy technologies can achieve sewage sludge treatment and energy recovery simultaneously. Having a comprehensive assessment for the related technologies can contribute to the decision-making process and sustainable development of sludge management industry. In this paper, a life cycle composite footprint index was proposed, including energy recovery, carbon emissions, water consumptions, nitrogen and sulfur flows. Related methodology framework was constructed to evaluate the sustainability performance of sludge-to-energy alternatives on the composite footprint index. Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) and fuzzy AHP method were applied to obtain the weights and the overall scores. A case study was carried out applying the established framework to assess six sludge-to-energy scenarios, covering dewatering, composting, drying, incineration, incinerated ash melting, and dewatered sludge melting by the life cycle composite energy-carbon-water index. Results showed that dewatered sludge melting was the most preferred option owing to the considerable quantity of energy production, while drying process was the undesired one because of the unsatisfactory performance on energy recovery and carbon emissions. Sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis were carried out to study the impacts of changing weights on different aspects and the influence of changing energy recovery amount from anaerobic digestion, lower heating value and carbon content in sewage sludge toward the sustainability assessment of the sludge-to-energy technologies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of cleaner production, 25 Jan. 2021, v. 281, 124885en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of cleaner productionen_US
dcterms.issued2021-01-25-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095730411-
dc.identifier.artn124885en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0178-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextResearch Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; Departmental General Research Funds (UAFT) of Department of Industrial and Systems Engineers, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS45655171-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liu_Developing_Life_Cycle.pdfPre-Published version3.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

62
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

Downloads

64
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.