Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94588
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering | en_US |
dc.creator | Lin, R | en_US |
dc.creator | Lu, S | en_US |
dc.creator | Yang, A | en_US |
dc.creator | Shen, W | en_US |
dc.creator | Ren, J | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-25T01:54:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-25T01:54:05Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-3199 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94588 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pergamon Press | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Lin, R., Lu, S., Yang, A., Shen, W., & Ren, J. (2021). Multi-criteria sustainability assessment and decision-making framework for hydrogen pathways prioritization: An extended ELECTRE method under hybrid information. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(24), 13430-13445 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.018. | en_US |
dc.subject | Best-worst method | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrogen production | en_US |
dc.subject | Multi-criteria decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | Sustainability assessment | en_US |
dc.title | Multi-criteria sustainability assessment and decision-making framework for hydrogen pathways prioritization : an extended ELECTRE method under hybrid information | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 13430 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 13445 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 46 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.018 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Hydrogen has been received more and more attentions because of its advantage in terms of low environmental impact and high energy density. However, the sustainability priorities of different hydrogen production pathways have not been determined. To assist the sustainability-oriented selection of hydrogen production pathways, a prioritization framework needs to be built. However, the data collected from different sources consisting of hybrid information, such as crisp numbers, interval numbers, and fuzzy numbers, increases the difficulty of sustainability-oriented decision-making. Therefore, this study aims to develop a sustainability prioritization framework for hydrogen production pathways under hybrid information. The Z-number Best Worst Method (ZBWM) is applied to quantify the weight of each criterion from the views of decision-makers in the forms of Z-number. The ELECTRE method has been extended to prioritize the alternatives under the context of hybrid information. An illustrative case including five hydrogen production processes is used to illustrate the proposed prioritization framework from environmental, social, economic, and technical aspects, and the results show that biomass hydrogen technology is the most sustainable choice. In order to validate the feasibility of the proposed model, other three multi-criteria decision making methods were also used to determine the sustainability rankings of these five hydrogen production pathways, and the comparisons reveal that this method is feasible. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | International journal of hydrogen energy, 6 Apr. 2021, v. 46, no. 24, p. 13430-13445 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | International journal of hydrogen energy | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2021-04-06 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85100873151 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-3487 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202208 bcww | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | ISE-0146 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
dc.description.fundingText | Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; the Joint Supervision Scheme with the Chinese Mainland, Taiwan and Macao Universities - Other Chinese Mainland, Taiwan and Macao Universities | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 45655270 | - |
dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lin_Multi-Criteria_Sustainability_Assessment.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.84 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
159
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024
Downloads
147
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
28
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
24
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.