Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94534
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorHuang, Cen_US
dc.creatorChan, FTSen_US
dc.creatorChung, SHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T01:53:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-25T01:53:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn0020-7543en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94534-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Production Research on 30 Aug 2021 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00207543.2021.1964706en_US
dc.subjectContent analysisen_US
dc.subjectFinancial managementen_US
dc.subjectSupply chain finance frameworken_US
dc.subjectSupply chain managementen_US
dc.subjectSystematic literature reviewen_US
dc.titleRecent contributions to supply chain finance : towards a theoretical and practical research agendaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage493en_US
dc.identifier.epage516en_US
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00207543.2021.1964706en_US
dcterms.abstractSupply chain finance (SCF) is an innovative solution dedicated to optimising financial flows in supply chains, and has drawn tremendous attention from academia and industry. Considering the ever-evolving nature of SCF, the existing literature reviews in this field are limited due to a lack of integration of recent findings. Motivated by the limitation, we attempt to fill this gap by investigating the novel achievements that have been reported in the current literature. By conducting a systematic literature review, we selected 99 qualified papers published between 2010 and the first quarter of 2021, and then used descriptive analysis to identify the literature characteristics, followed by in-depth content analysis. We synthesised nine research dimensions in the selected SCF literature. By virtue of comprehensive analysis, we illustrated the embedded mechanisms among all participants in SCF practices, updated the SCF research framework, summarised the most dominant methods applied in current research, made two classifications of the financial service providers (FSPs) and SCF instruments, and provided five future research directions. The significance of this paper lies in providing both a novel theoretical foundation for academic researchers and a practical guide for industrial practitioners.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of production research, 2022, v. 60, no. 2, p. 493-516en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of production researchen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85113737364-
dc.identifier.eissn1366-588Xen_US
dc.description.validate202208 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0202-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS60280290-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Huang_Recent_Contributions_Supply.pdfPre-Published version4.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

130
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

Downloads

618
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

39
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.