Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94361
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorMainland Development Officeen_US
dc.creatorWu, HDen_US
dc.creatorChu, WCWen_US
dc.creatorHe, CQen_US
dc.creatorWong, MSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T03:04:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-12T03:04:32Z-
dc.identifier.issn0309-3646en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94361-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Wu H-D, Chu WC-W, He C-Q, Wong M-S. Assessment of the plane of maximum curvature for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis via computed tomography. Prosthetics and Orthotics (Volume: 44 issue: 5) pp. 298-304. Copyright ©2020 The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics. DOI: 10.1177/0309364620941297.en_US
dc.subjectAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisen_US
dc.subjectComputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectPlane of maximum curvatureen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the plane of maximum curvature for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis via computed tomographyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage298en_US
dc.identifier.epage304en_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0309364620941297en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: In the assessment of three-dimensional features of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the plane of maximum curvature was compared with the coronal Cobb angle.en_US
dcterms.abstractObjectives: To investigate the intrarater reliability, variability, and difference of the prone plane of maximum curvature measurements taken from computed tomography using the constrained and unconstrained Cobb methods; to assess the difference and correlation between the prone plane of maximum curvature measurements obtained using the constrained and unconstrained Cobb methods; and to examine differences and correlation between the prone plane of maximum curvature Cobb angle and coronal Cobb angle measurements.en_US
dcterms.abstractStudy design: Retrospective study.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Records of 29 subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis aged 15.8 ± 3.5 years were reviewed (25 thoracic and 24 thoracolumbar/lumbar curves). An experienced rater measured the plane of maximum curvature using the constrained and unconstrained Cobb methods, and the coronal Cobb angles using the conventional Cobb method on computed tomography images 3 times each with 1-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), one-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and paired t test were applied for various analyses.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: The intraclass correlation coefficients for all intrarater reliability assessments were greater than 0.87. The plane of maximum curvature measurements of the two Cobb methods were excellently correlated (r ⩾ 0.97) with no significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean plane of maximum curvature Cobb angle was moderately correlated with (r > 0.72) but significantly greater (P < 0.001) than the mean coronal Cobb angle.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The plane of maximum curvature measurements obtained from computed tomography were found to be reliable while the plane of maximum curvature measurements of the two Cobb methods were comparable. The mean plane of maximum curvature Cobb angle was moderately correlated with but significantly greater than the mean coronal Cobb angle.en_US
dcterms.abstractClinical relevance: The plane of maximum curvature measurements taken from computed tomography was found to be reliable, hence it could be used as a supplement to the coronal Cobb angle in the assessment and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. With technological advancement, the radiation dose of computed tomography can be further reduced to a safer level for a broader range of cases.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationProsthetics and orthotics international, Oct. 2020, v. 44, no. 5, p. 298-304en_US
dcterms.isPartOfProsthetics and orthotics internationalen_US
dcterms.issued2020-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088382374-
dc.identifier.pmid32693677-
dc.identifier.eissn1746-1553en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBME-0064-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS51850578-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wu_Assessment_Plane_Maximum.pdfPre-Published version877.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

61
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

Downloads

93
Citations as of Sep 22, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.