Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94099
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorWu, Zen_US
dc.creatorChen, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-11T01:07:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-11T01:07:06Z-
dc.identifier.issn2542-5277en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94099-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Co.en_US
dc.rights© John Benjamins Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wu, Z., & Chen, Z. (2021). A systematic review of experimental research in audiovisual translation 1992–2020. Translation, Cognition & Behavior, 4(2), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00056.wu is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00056.wu.en_US
dc.rightsTranslation, Cognition & Behavior is available at https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/25425285en_US
dc.subjectAudiovisual translationen_US
dc.subjectExperimenten_US
dc.subjectResearch synthesisen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleA systematic review of experimental research in audiovisual translation 1992–2020en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage281en_US
dc.identifier.epage304en_US
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/tcb.00056.wuen_US
dcterms.abstractThis study systematically reviewed 61 experimental studies on audiovisual translation (AVT), published in academic journals between 1992 and 2020. The review examined five aspects of these studies: publication trends, research scopes, research designs, statistical procedures, and reporting practices. Major findings include: (a) there has been a slight concentration of publication outlets for experimental AVT research; (b) the focal studies could be categorized into three themes (product, process, and pedagogy), with the product theme being the most popular and subtitling the dominant AVT modality; (c) the inclusion of a comparison group was the most common design feature, and questionnaires and tests were the most popular research instruments; (d) inferential statistical analysis was favored over descriptive statistical analysis; (e) data normality information and effect sizes were not regularly reported. Based on the systematic review, suggestions are made for the future development of experimental AVT research.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTranslation, cognition & behavior, 2021, v. 4, no. 2, p. 281-304en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTranslation, cognition & behavioren_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127361020-
dc.identifier.eissn2542-5285en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1576-
dc.identifier.SubFormID45497-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wu_Systematic_Review_Audiovisual.pdfPre-Published version629.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

213
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Feb 9, 2026

Downloads

788
Citations as of Feb 9, 2026

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
Citations as of May 8, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.