Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93643
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Management and Marketing | en_US |
dc.creator | Chai, J | en_US |
dc.creator | Ngai, EWT | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-19T08:14:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-19T08:14:00Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-9236 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93643 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Chai, J., & Ngai, E. W. (2020). The variable precision method for elicitation of probability weighting functions. Decision Support Systems, 128, 113166 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113166. | en_US |
dc.subject | Behavioral decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | Nonparametric elicitation | en_US |
dc.subject | Probability weighting | en_US |
dc.subject | Prospect theory | en_US |
dc.subject | Tradeoff method | en_US |
dc.title | The variable precision method for elicitation of probability weighting functions | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113166 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | This study introduces a nonparametric method to elicit decision weights under prospect theory. These weights carry the attitudes and subjective beliefs of individuals toward risks and uncertainties. Our variable precision method adopts a dynamic mechanism that can elicit the measuring points of individual probability weighting flexibly. These points are used to exhibit violations of expected utility theory, which measures individual risk attitudes and captures subjective beliefs on probabilities. Our method is flexible, tractable, and cognitively less demanding compared with other nonparametric elicitations in the literature. Experimental studies are conducted on a sample of Hong Kong (China) residents to verify our method. Our experimental results yield a prevailing inverse-S shape. We conduct the analyses and uncover their implications by comparing them with the results of residents of Beijing, Shanghai, Paris, and Amsterdam. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Decision support systems, Jan. 2020, v. 128, 113166 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Decision support systems | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2020-01 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85074436436 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-5797 | en_US |
dc.identifier.artn | 113166 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202207 bchy | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | MM-0099 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
dc.description.fundingText | Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 26741458 | - |
dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ngai_Variable_Precision_Method.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
60
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Jan 5, 2025
Downloads
92
Citations as of Jan 5, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
Citations as of Jan 9, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
4
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.