Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93113
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | School of Hotel and Tourism Management | en_US |
| dc.creator | Wang, X | en_US |
| dc.creator | Hwang, Y | en_US |
| dc.creator | Guchait, P | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-09T06:13:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-09T06:13:54Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1525-6480 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93113 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration on 29 Dec 2021 (Published online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15256480.2021.2017812. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Apology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Service recovery | en_US |
| dc.subject | Service robot | en_US |
| dc.title | When robot (vs. human) employees say “sorry” following service failure | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 540 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 562 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 24 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/15256480.2021.2017812 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | This paper aims to understand travelers’ responses to apologies of robot (vs. human) employees following service failures and how travelers’ age influences their responses. Using a scenario-based between-subject experimental design, Study 1 finds that human employees’ apologies (vs. no apologies) enhance travelers’ revisit intention while robot employees’ apologies do not have such an effect. Study 2 reveals that human employees’ apologies increase satisfaction among younger travelers, whereas robot employees’ apologies increase satisfaction among older travelers. Managers in the hospitality and tourism industry may train their employees (vs. design robot employees’ apology messages) effectively to serve travelers in different ages. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | International journal of hospitality & tourism administration, 2023, v. 24, no. 4, p. 540-562 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | International journal of hospitality & tourism administration | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85122107706 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1525-6499 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202206 bckw | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | SHTM-0137 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 60608789 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang_Robot_Vs._Human.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
202
Last Week
8
8
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
637
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
38
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
39
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



