Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93049
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorChang, CBen_US
dc.creatorYao, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T04:31:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-01T04:31:05Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-646-80069-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93049-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Phonetic Associationen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/)en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Charles B. Chang & Yao Yao 2019. Production of neutral tone in Mandarin by heritage, native, and second language speakers. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 2291-2295) is available at https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/.en_US
dc.subjectHeritage speakersen_US
dc.subjectL2 learnersen_US
dc.subjectNeutral toneen_US
dc.subjectLexical toneen_US
dc.subjectMandarin Chineseen_US
dc.titleProduction of neutral tone in Mandarin by heritage, native, and second language speakersen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage2291en_US
dc.identifier.epage2295en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study examined the properties of neutral tone (T0) in Mandarin as produced by three groups: native speakers raised in a Mandarin-speaking environment (L1ers), second language learners raised in an English-speaking environment (L2ers), and heritage language speakers (HLers) exposed to Mandarin from birth but currently dominant in English. T0 production was elicited in both obligatory and non-obligatory contexts, acoustically analyzed, and perceptually evaluated by Mandarin L1ers. Acoustic data indicated little difference among groups in pitch contour, but significant differences in duration, especially in the non-obligatory context. Perceptual data revealed relatively low intelligibility of T0 overall, but also a group difference whereby L2ers tended to outperform HLers in the non-obligatory context; nevertheless, L2ers received the lowest goodness ratings, across both contexts. These results thus suggest that phonetic differences between HLers and L2ers are not unidirectional, but instead vary across aspects of the language in accordance with differences in speakers’ linguistic experience.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn S Calhoun, P Escudero, Ma Tabain & P Warren (Eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, p. 2291-2295. Melbourne, Australia: International Phonetic Association, 2019en_US
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.relation.ispartofbookProceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019en_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences [ICPhS]en_US
dc.description.validate202206 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1276, CBS-0218en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID44425-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextresearch grants from the Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS26086585en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ICPhS_2340.pdf779.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

136
Last Week
12
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

46
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.