Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92875
| Title: | Assessment of maximum spinal deformity in scoliosis : a literature review | Authors: | Wu, HD Wong, MS |
Issue Date: | Oct-2020 | Source: | Journal of medical and biological engineering, Oct. 2020, v. 40, no. 5, p. 621-629 | Abstract: | Purpose: The plane of maximum curvature (PMC), end-apical-end vertebrae plane (EAEP), and best-fit plane (BFP) have been used to describe the three-dimensional (3D) features of scoliosis but no thorough analyses were conducted. This study aimed to systematically review these descriptors about their potential differences, measurement techniques, and applications in scoliosis. Methods: Articles were retrieved from six databases and Google Scholar search engine using the keywords “maximum spinal deformity” and “scoliosis” combined with “And”. Results: BFP was found superior to EAEP and PMC in describing the 3D features of scoliosis; however, whether this advantage changes when BFP or EAEP orientation is simplified remains unknown. With the development of 3D reconstruction technique, radiographs and ultrasound images can be used to estimate maximum spinal deformity. The three descriptors have been applied in 3D assessment, progression monitoring, and classification of scoliosis, as well as evaluation of orthotic and surgical treatments but are rarely considered in major clinical decision-making. Conclusion: More evidence is needed to support the superiority of PMC and simplified EAE and BFP, the accuracy of radiographic and ultrasound techniques, and the application of these descriptors to clinical decision-making. Further studies are deserved. |
Keywords: | Best-fit plane End-apical-end vertebrae plane Maximum deformity Plane of maximum curvature Scoliosis |
Publisher: | Springer | Journal: | Journal of medical and biological engineering | ISSN: | 1609-0985 | EISSN: | 2199-4757 | DOI: | 10.1007/s40846-020-00558-z | Rights: | © Taiwanese Society of Biomedical Engineering 2020 This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use(https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00558-z |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wu_Assessment_Maximum_Spinal.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
91
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
103
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
4
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



