Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92125
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorYang, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T02:18:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-08T02:18:08Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/92125-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021en_US
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution ofthe work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yang, Y. (2021). Disagreement Strategies on Chinese Forums: Comparing Data From Hong Kong and Mainland China. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1-12 is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211036879en_US
dc.subjectComputer-mediated communicationen_US
dc.subjectDisagreementen_US
dc.subjectInteractional approachen_US
dc.subjectIntercultural communicationen_US
dc.subjectPolitenessen_US
dc.titleDisagreement strategies on Chinese forums : comparing data from Hong Kong and mainland Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage12-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/21582440211036879-
dcterms.abstractPrior research on disagreement has mainly focused on its negative impact, suggesting that disagreement should be avoided in communication. Consequently, disagreement is rarely studied in computer-mediated communication, particularly in the Chinese context. Adopting the interactional approach, this project pioneers the investigation of disagreement strategies on online forums in Hong Kong and mainland China, in hopes of providing insights into a better understanding of disagreement in the Chinese online context and shedding light on politeness theory in intercultural communication among Chinese people. Two threads on a similar topic were selected, from which 400 comments were collected and annotated for further analysis. Our results showed that, instead of being a face-threatening act, disagreement maintained and enhanced the interlocutors’ face and advanced the communication of information within each thread. Moreover, although the distribution of the five disagreement strategies was similar in the two sites, there were notably more disagreement tokens and negative comments on the Hong Kong forum. The observed divergence has been attributed to the different degrees of collectivism–individualism in the two regions, the internet censorship in mainland China and the nature of the two forums selected, which remain to be confirmed in future studies.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSAGE open, 1 July 2021, v. 11, no. 3, p. 1-12-
dcterms.isPartOfSAGE open-
dcterms.issued2021-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85112082113-
dc.identifier.eissn2158-2440-
dc.description.validate202202 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
21582440211036879.pdf374.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

83
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

Downloads

148
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of May 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.