Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91857
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorSiu, AMHen_US
dc.creatorChien, Cen_US
dc.creatorCheung, RYSen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T05:53:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-29T05:53:08Z-
dc.identifier.issn0271-9517en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91857-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© NACADAen_US
dc.rightsThe article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY NC SA 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Siu, A. M., Chien, C. W., Cheung, R. Y., & Shek, D. T. (2021). A Strength-based Inventory for Assessing the Needs for Academic Advising of University Students in Hong Kong. NACADA Journal, 41(2), 53-67 is available at https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-21-13en_US
dc.subjectStrength-baseden_US
dc.subjectInventoryen_US
dc.subjectAcademic advisingen_US
dc.subjectUniversity studentsen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.titleA strength-based inventory for assessing the needs for academic advising of university students in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage53en_US
dc.identifier.epage67en_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12930/NACADA-21-13en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study aims to develop and validate a strength-based instrument for assessing the academic advising needs of university students in Hong Kong using the Appreciative Advising Inventory (AAI) as a blueprint. We reviewed the content validity and cultural relevance of the AAI and developed a 37-item AAI Hong Kong Version (AAI-HK). We conducted Rasch analysis and principal component analysis. The AAI-HK has four stable and reliable factors (social competence and support; positive identity and participation; positive values; and commitment to learning and study), which represent key strengths of university students. Four AAI-HK subscales demonstrate good reliability. We found significant differences in AAI-HK scores between students who are under academic probation or not and between students who are local or nonlocal.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNACADA journal, 2021, v. 41, no. 2, p. 53-67en_US
dcterms.isPartOfNACADA journalen_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.eissn2330-3840en_US
dc.description.validate202112 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1131-n01-
dc.identifier.SubFormID43981-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Siu_Strength-based_Inventory_Assessing.pdf158.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

25
Citations as of Jul 3, 2022

Downloads

5
Citations as of Jul 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.