Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91857
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorSiu, AMHen_US
dc.creatorChien, Cen_US
dc.creatorCheung, RYSen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T05:53:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-29T05:53:08Z-
dc.identifier.issn0271-9517en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91857-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© NACADAen_US
dc.rightsThe article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY NC SA 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Siu, A. M., Chien, C. W., Cheung, R. Y., & Shek, D. T. (2021). A Strength-based Inventory for Assessing the Needs for Academic Advising of University Students in Hong Kong. NACADA Journal, 41(2), 53-67 is available at https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-21-13en_US
dc.subjectStrength-baseden_US
dc.subjectInventoryen_US
dc.subjectAcademic advisingen_US
dc.subjectUniversity studentsen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.titleA strength-based inventory for assessing the needs for academic advising of university students in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage53en_US
dc.identifier.epage67en_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12930/NACADA-21-13en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study aims to develop and validate a strength-based instrument for assessing the academic advising needs of university students in Hong Kong using the Appreciative Advising Inventory (AAI) as a blueprint. We reviewed the content validity and cultural relevance of the AAI and developed a 37-item AAI Hong Kong Version (AAI-HK). We conducted Rasch analysis and principal component analysis. The AAI-HK has four stable and reliable factors (social competence and support; positive identity and participation; positive values; and commitment to learning and study), which represent key strengths of university students. Four AAI-HK subscales demonstrate good reliability. We found significant differences in AAI-HK scores between students who are under academic probation or not and between students who are local or nonlocal.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNACADA journal, 2021, v. 41, no. 2, p. 53-67en_US
dcterms.isPartOfNACADA journalen_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.eissn2330-3840en_US
dc.description.validate202112 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1131-n01-
dc.identifier.SubFormID43981-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Siu_Strength-based_Inventory_Assessing.pdf158.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

84
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

Downloads

37
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.