Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91839
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorDai, Ten_US
dc.creatorLiu, Sen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Jen_US
dc.creatorJiang, Nen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Wen_US
dc.creatorChen, Qen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T02:14:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T02:14:45Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91839-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Dai, T., Liu, S., Liu, J., Jiang, N., Liu, W., & Chen, Q. (2022). Evaluation of fast fluid dynamics with different turbulence models for predicting outdoor airflow and pollutant dispersion. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103583 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103583.en_US
dc.subjectComputational efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectFast fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectOutdoor airflowen_US
dc.subjectPollutant dispersionen_US
dc.subjectTurbulence modelen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of fast fluid dynamics with different turbulence models for predicting outdoor airflow and pollutant dispersionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume77en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scs.2021.103583en_US
dcterms.abstractFast fluid dynamics (FFD) could provide informative and efficient airflow and concentration simulation. The commonly used turbulence model in FFD was Re-Normalization Group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model which solved two transport equations to obtain eddy viscosity. To reduce this part of time and further improve computing speed, this investigation implemented no turbulence model, Smagorinsky model and dynamic Smagorinsky model which calculated eddy viscosity without solving equation in FFD in an open-source program, OpenFOAM. By simulating several outdoor cases of varying complexity and comparing with experiment and CFD, this study assessed the accuracy and computing efficiency of FFD with four turbulence models. Compared with CFD, FFD greatly improved the computing speed without reducing accuracy. The simulation of FFD without turbulence model was fast but inaccurate. FFD with Smagorinsky model increased the computing speed while ensuring the same accuracy as RNG k-ε turbulence model. FFD with dynamic Smagorinsky model provided accurate results with high efficiency. Computation errors arose mainly from inaccurate prediction of turbulence dispersion. The computing cost was associated with the number of transport equations and calculation method of model coefficient. This investigation recommended the use of FFD with dynamic Smagorinsky model for outdoor airflow and pollutant dispersion studies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable cities and society, Feb. 2022, v. 77, 103583en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable cities and societyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120710331-
dc.identifier.eissn2210-6707en_US
dc.identifier.artn103583en_US
dc.description.validate202112 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1120-n04-
dc.identifier.SubFormID43963-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) through grant No. 52108084 and by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation through Grant No. 2020M680886. We acknowledged financial support from Stiftelsen för internationalisering av högre utbild-ning och forskning (STINT), Sweden (Dnr: CH2020-8665)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dai_Evaluation_Fast_Fluid.pdfPre-Published version4.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

138
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

277
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

46
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

44
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.