Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91661
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Sustainable Urban Development-
dc.creatorAdenle, YA-
dc.creatorChan, EHW-
dc.creatorSun, Y-
dc.creatorChau, CK-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T06:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-24T06:07:25Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91661-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Adenle, Y. A., Chan, E. H., Sun, Y., & Chau, C. K. (2020). Exploring the coverage of environmental-dimension indicators in existing campus sustainability appraisal tools. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8, 100057 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100057en_US
dc.subjectHigher educational institutionsen_US
dc.subjectGISen_US
dc.subjectSMART Approachen_US
dc.subjectIndicatorsen_US
dc.subjectCampus sustainability assessment toolsen_US
dc.titleExploring the coverage of environmental-dimension indicators in existing campus sustainability appraisal toolsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.indic.2020.100057-
dcterms.abstractDespite the plethora of comprehensive review of campus sustainability assessment tools, reporting, and indicators in the extant literature, studies are absent specifically on campus-wide and spatial-based indicators in existing tools. Although, several academic campuses across the globe are located on a vast area of land with multiple activities and operations associated with serious ecological consequences. This paper explores the environmental-dimension indicators with spatial and campus-wide attributes in 13 existing campus sustainability appraisal tools via coverage evaluation and the SMART approach. The findings reveal a severe absence of comprehensive coverage of spatial-based indicators and the lack of the integration of a GIS and or related spatial software in their appraisal process. The article demonstrates how integrating GIS and or other related spatial techniques and software into environmental dimension indicators with campus-wide and spatial attributes could be carried out to remedy the challenges of absence, inadequate of or restrained access to basic information for campus sustainability appraisal project in developing world.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnvironmental and sustainability indicators, Dec. 2020, v. 8, 100057-
dcterms.isPartOfEnvironmental and sustainability indicators-
dcterms.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000646888000006-
dc.identifier.eissn2665-9727-
dc.identifier.artn100057-
dc.description.validate202111 bchy-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Adenle_Exploring_coverage_environmental-dimension.pdf747.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

101
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

Downloads

34
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
Citations as of Mar 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.