Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91661
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Sustainable Urban Development-
dc.creatorAdenle, YA-
dc.creatorChan, EHW-
dc.creatorSun, Y-
dc.creatorChau, CK-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T06:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-24T06:07:25Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91661-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Adenle, Y. A., Chan, E. H., Sun, Y., & Chau, C. K. (2020). Exploring the coverage of environmental-dimension indicators in existing campus sustainability appraisal tools. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8, 100057 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100057en_US
dc.subjectHigher educational institutionsen_US
dc.subjectGISen_US
dc.subjectSMART Approachen_US
dc.subjectIndicatorsen_US
dc.subjectCampus sustainability assessment toolsen_US
dc.titleExploring the coverage of environmental-dimension indicators in existing campus sustainability appraisal toolsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.indic.2020.100057-
dcterms.abstractDespite the plethora of comprehensive review of campus sustainability assessment tools, reporting, and indicators in the extant literature, studies are absent specifically on campus-wide and spatial-based indicators in existing tools. Although, several academic campuses across the globe are located on a vast area of land with multiple activities and operations associated with serious ecological consequences. This paper explores the environmental-dimension indicators with spatial and campus-wide attributes in 13 existing campus sustainability appraisal tools via coverage evaluation and the SMART approach. The findings reveal a severe absence of comprehensive coverage of spatial-based indicators and the lack of the integration of a GIS and or related spatial software in their appraisal process. The article demonstrates how integrating GIS and or other related spatial techniques and software into environmental dimension indicators with campus-wide and spatial attributes could be carried out to remedy the challenges of absence, inadequate of or restrained access to basic information for campus sustainability appraisal project in developing world.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnvironmental and sustainability indicators, Dec. 2020, v. 8, 100057-
dcterms.isPartOfEnvironmental and sustainability indicators-
dcterms.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000646888000006-
dc.identifier.eissn2665-9727-
dc.identifier.artn100057-
dc.description.validate202111 bchy-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Adenle_Exploring_coverage_environmental-dimension.pdf747.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

241
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026

Downloads

174
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
Citations as of Jun 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.