Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91609
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorWernli, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T04:02:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-18T04:02:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn1571-0882en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91609-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in CoDesign on 15 Nov 2021 (Published online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15710882.2021.2001534en_US
dc.subjectAgroecological explorationen_US
dc.subjectCommunityen_US
dc.subjectFermenten_US
dc.subjectHuman wasteen_US
dc.subjectSituational analysisen_US
dc.subjectSocial creativityen_US
dc.titleCollective wondering : enabling productive uncertainty in agroecological codesignen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage95en_US
dc.identifier.epage114en_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15710882.2021.2001534en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper explores the transformative relations of unknowable possibility in three urban communities which upcycle human waste. Working with communities – human and nonhuman – is approached by applying the dynamic model of collective wondering conceived as (i) provisional proposition, (ii) responsiveness to difference, and (iii) affirmation in/of uncertainty. The communities act in concert with people, microbes, and earthworms to address unsustainable food systems. Their profoundly self-implicating engagement on the material, social and cultural level stems from a pendulation between actionable immersion (wondering at) and perspectival detachment (wondering about). Community – understood as togetherness in wondering – becomes a conduit for imaginative, counter-intuitive thinking, and doing that can diversify existent, dominant, and hegemonic perspectives. Three agroecological cases illustrate how cultivating a rich, interactive context for exchanging or moving positions give birth to a plurality of perspectives, human and nonhuman, on the world. Since physical, social, and cultural positions in people and groups are never fully determined, codesign that provides ample possibility for repositioning – including unsettling bathroom routines, group debates, compost care, and agroecological tinkering – is crucial for opening perspectives and influencing how people act in close relation with unknowable otherness.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCoDesign, 2021, v. 18, no. 1, p. 95-114en_US
dcterms.isPartOfCoDesignen_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.eissn1745-3755en_US
dc.description.validate202111 bcwhen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1071-n01, a1381-
dc.identifier.SubFormID43882, 44748-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SD-0000_Wernli_Collective_Wondering.pdfPre-Published version2.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

64
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

49
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.